2006
DOI: 10.1071/wr05031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summer survey of dugong distribution and abundance in Shark Bay reveals additional key habitat area

Abstract: The first standardised summer aerial survey of dugongs within Shark Bay in Western Australia, and the fourth in a series of surveys of this area, was undertaken during February 2002. This survey returned a population estimate of 11 021 ± 1357 (s.e.), a result similar to the first two winter surveys in 1989 and 1994 but considerably lower than the 1999 survey. Distribution was markedly different in this survey compared with all previous surveys, which were conducted during winter, confirming that dugongs within… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, seasonal movements are correlated to temperature changes [2], [54]–[56]. Second, dugongs seem to move further southwards along the east coast of Australia in warm years [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, seasonal movements are correlated to temperature changes [2], [54]–[56]. Second, dugongs seem to move further southwards along the east coast of Australia in warm years [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study 3:— Use of alternative foraging tactics by dugongs ( Dugong dugon ) in Shark Bay —Shark Bay is home to over 10,000 dugongs (Holley et al . 2006), many of which make use of our study area (> Wirsing et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the higher latitude limits of their range in summer, dugongs are most frequently sighted over shallow seagrass meadows, but in winter they are also sighted in deeper waters where sea temperatures are warmer ( e.g ., Preen , Lanyon , Holley et al . , Sheppard et al . , Marsh et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%