2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0361-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunscreens block cutaneous vitamin D production with only a minimal effect on circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Abstract: Although a 50+ sunscreen decreases significantly cutaneous vitamin D production following a single nbUVB exposure, and independently from the BSA, the circulating 25(OH)D levels were only minimally affected. This could be explained by a switch to another endogenous source of precursors. Short-term sunscreen use probably does not affect circulating vitamin D levels and hence does not increase the risk for osteoporosis. The effect of long-term sunscreen use remains however to be determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This variable was not a determining factor in the dosage of vitamin D levels for both groups, similar to the results of the study by Niruban et al with infants with RW. Because of their photo absorbent property, the protectors significantly reduce or even block the absorption of UVB radiation through the skin …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…This variable was not a determining factor in the dosage of vitamin D levels for both groups, similar to the results of the study by Niruban et al with infants with RW. Because of their photo absorbent property, the protectors significantly reduce or even block the absorption of UVB radiation through the skin …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In general, the UVR dose of these studies is low, e.g. this was 0·8 MED (estimated to be ~3 SED in skin type III volunteers) with SPF 50 at 2 mg cm −2 in the study of Libon et al . Taking the SPF at face value means the dose through the sunscreen is 3/50 = 0·06 SED.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendations From Panel Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clothes that cover most of the body parts for cultural reasons, and frequent application of sunscreen creams on skin in females could be the reasons of lower summer vitamin D levels in female patients with PID. [22,23] In the study group, number of the patients with low serum vitamin D levels who had infections in winter was higher than those in summer. Although there are numerous studies showing the association between vitamin D levels and infection, reports demonstrating the effects of seasonal vitamin D variations on infections in PID patients are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%