Suomalaisten yliopistojen avoimet julkaisut vuonna 2016 OKM:n julkaisutiedonkeruun tietojen valossa

Abstract

The Finnish Open Access monitoring efforts are integrated with the national data collection conducted by CSC -IT Center for Science for the Ministry of Education and Culture. The publication data collected from the CRIS of each participating organization can be browsed at Juuli (www.juuli.fi), a discovery interface developed by the National Library of Finland. Starting from 2016, two separate fields have been used for indicating the OA status of each publication. One of the fields indicates whether the publication is OA via a Gold or a Hybrid channel, and the second field is used for indicating whether it has been deposited into a repository. The OA definition used in the data collection has also been updated to make it as clear as possible. According to the current dataset for the year 2016, 28.9 % of all peer-reviewed articles produced within the Finnish universities were reported as being OA. There was a lot of overlap between Gold/Hybrid and Green OA, as about 60 % of the articles deposited into repositories were already OA via Gold or Hybrid OA publication channels.Asiasanat: open access; tieteellinen julkaisutoiminta; yliopistot; tieteenalat; tilastot

Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers

“…The most comprehensive analysis so far concerning OA in the Finnish publication landscape is a study by Ilva (2017b) which is available in Finnish. The author provides an overview of summarized data for the publication year 2016 of all publication types based on CRIS data reported from all universities, universities of applied sciences and research centers in Finland.…”

“…The data includes OA status information submitted by the organizations themselves, with each publication being published in an OA journal or as hybrid OA, and/or self-archived in a repository. An embargo is allowed for the alternative of self-archiving but not for the alternative of full OA journal which omits the alternative of OA through delayed OA journals (Ilva, 2017b). The study provides a breakdown of OA availability of peer-reviewed articles published by universityaffiliated authors, with 18.7% of articles being in full OA journals, 3.4% on the publisher's website but not in a full OA journal (e.g., hybrid OA), and 18.5% self-archived to a repository.…”

“…Based on this review of earlier country-level studies it can be concluded that national information sources remain underexploited in analysis of OA, and previous studies have focused predominantly on journal publishing (with the exception of Ilva [2017b]). The focus on journal articles is explained partly by OA policies and research funder mandates that have, so far, mainly concerned only this publication type.…”

“…Like many European countries, Finland has been at the forefront of developing national strategies for advancing OA. In 2014-2017, the Ministry of Education and Culture funded a national project, the Open Science and Research Initiative, which set ambitious national targets for the share of open access research publications: 65% in 2017, 75% in 2018, and 100% in 2020 (Ilva, 2017b).…”

Open access -kustantajien evaluointi tieteellisen kirjaston näkökulmasta

“…Tähän liittyy mm. se, että julkaisuarkistoihin tallennetaan myös OA-lehdissä julkaistuja artikkeleita, lisäksi yliopistoilla voi olla erilaisia tapoja raportoida rinnakkaistallennettuja tai muuten avoimesti saatavilla olevia julkaisuja (Ilva, 2017).…”