2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-008-0588-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superior segmental optic nerve hypoplasia in youth

Abstract: Characteristic VFD patterns on Goldmann perimetry and corresponding NFLDs are important in the diagnosis of SSOH, but not optic disc morphology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not all of these features could be consistently found in other reports 6,810. Instead, a double-ring sign, which is a hallmark of optic hypoplasia, has been found 10. Also, while previous reports from Western countries have demonstrated that SSOH is frequently associated with maternal type 1 diabetes mellitus, reports from Japan and Korea have not supported this association 10,12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, not all of these features could be consistently found in other reports 6,810. Instead, a double-ring sign, which is a hallmark of optic hypoplasia, has been found 10. Also, while previous reports from Western countries have demonstrated that SSOH is frequently associated with maternal type 1 diabetes mellitus, reports from Japan and Korea have not supported this association 10,12.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Instead, a double-ring sign, which is a hallmark of optic hypoplasia, has been found 10. Also, while previous reports from Western countries have demonstrated that SSOH is frequently associated with maternal type 1 diabetes mellitus, reports from Japan and Korea have not supported this association 10,12. Thus, the definition of SSOH remains obscure, and it may possibly consist of multiple optic nerve anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The typical disc morphology of SSOH may incorrectly lead to a diagnosis of NTG or JOAG, especially if the IOP is considered borderline. Takagi et al proposed several key differences between SSOH from NTG: in SSOH, visual fields show no Bjerrum scotoma, disc cupping is not classically glaucomatous and can be out of proportional to the severity of the visual field defect [2]. RNFL defects in SSOH have a sectored pattern, in contrast to the localized slit-like pattern found in NTG [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%