Proceedings Sixth Asian Test Symposium (ATS'97)
DOI: 10.1109/ats.1997.643985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supply current test for unit-to-unit variations of electrical characteristics in gates

Abstract: A practical supply current test method is proposed and the experimental evaluation results are presented. In the method, the unit-to-unit variation of electrical characteristics in each logic gate is modeled as a Gaussian distribution and faults are detected with a statistical hypothesis technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) where I iL and I iH are quiescent supply currents of i-th bipolar gate when the output logic value is L and when it is H, respectively.…”
Section: Supply Current Test Methods For Bipolar Logic Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(6) where I iL and I iH are quiescent supply currents of i-th bipolar gate when the output logic value is L and when it is H, respectively.…”
Section: Supply Current Test Methods For Bipolar Logic Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, we proposed a random test generation algorithm [4] and a deterministic one [5] for the supply current tests. In our experiments, test input vectors are derived by a modified random test input generation method, which is almost the same as in [6].…”
Section: Testability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Characteristic parameters are derived from the circuit files by SPICE simulation and the mean value and the variance are calculated for each inserted bridging fault. In our experiments, it is determined whether the fault can be detected with the specified level of significance(a) like in [16,17]. Since usually, either 0.1 or 0.01 is used as a, they are used in our experiments.…”
Section: Testability Of Our Iddq Test For Process Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%