“…Others have successfully demonstrated that users can learn abstract mappings between EMG activity and prosthesis output (Radhakrishnan et al, 2008, Pistohl et al, 2013, Antuvan et al, 2014). Both linear (Hahne et al, 2014, Jiang et al, 2014b, Smith et al, 2015a) and nonlinear (Jiang et al, 2012, Hahne et al, 2014, Kamavuako et al, 2012, Ameri et al, 2014, Ngeo et al, 2014, Muceli and Farina, 2012) methods of mapping EMG activity to prosthesis movement have been evaluated, though a large emphasis of real-time evaluation has focused on linear methods and is commonly motivated by the motor control concept of muscle synergies (Jiang et al, 2009, d’Avella et al, 2006). EMG amplitude estimates (such as root-mean-square or mean absolute value (MAV)) are typically the primary signal feature used as inputs into these systems (Hahne et al, 2014, Jiang et al, 2014b, Smith et al, 2015a), as they positively correlate with contraction intensity (De Luca, 1997).…”