2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface characterisation and biomechanical analysis of the sclera by atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…surface roughness, as revealed by the corresponding height and phase images taken in tapping mode under water ( figure 4 c,d ) and respective height profile ( figure 4 e ). The AFM elastic modulus is generally affected by the surface roughness, given that the interaction volume between the tip and the sample changes depending on how many surface protrusions are in contact with the tip [ 65 ]. By comparing surface heterogeneities among hydrogels, however, larger roughness values ( R a : 31 nm; R q : 20 nm; table 1 ) were determined on hydrogel CRT-4VBC25 * with respect to hydrogel CRT-4VBC50 * ( R a : 13 nm; R q : 16 nm; table 1 ), despite larger E AFM regional variations being observed in the latter compared with the former sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…surface roughness, as revealed by the corresponding height and phase images taken in tapping mode under water ( figure 4 c,d ) and respective height profile ( figure 4 e ). The AFM elastic modulus is generally affected by the surface roughness, given that the interaction volume between the tip and the sample changes depending on how many surface protrusions are in contact with the tip [ 65 ]. By comparing surface heterogeneities among hydrogels, however, larger roughness values ( R a : 31 nm; R q : 20 nm; table 1 ) were determined on hydrogel CRT-4VBC25 * with respect to hydrogel CRT-4VBC50 * ( R a : 13 nm; R q : 16 nm; table 1 ), despite larger E AFM regional variations being observed in the latter compared with the former sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its importance, several studies have characterised anisotropy, hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity in scleral tissue (Curtin, 1969;Downs et al, 2005;Eilaghi et al, 2010aEilaghi et al, , 2010bGirard et al, 2009a;Myers et al, 2010;Woo et al, 1972), and determined the regional variations of its biomechanical behaviour and thickness (Curtin, 1969;Elsheikh et al, 2010a;Norman et al, 2010;Olsen et al, 1998). Particular attention has been given to the fibrous stroma which, similar to corneal stroma, constitutes 90% of scleral thickness and dominates overall behaviour (Grant et al, 2011). Similar to the cornea, scleral stroma is composed of mainly type I collagen fibrils embedded within a matrix of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans, with the proteoglycans forming the essential cross-bridge structures between the fibrils (Fullwood et al, 2011;Meek and Fullwood, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic force microscopy has been used extensively to measure stiffness of substrates for cell culture [43] and the stiffness properties of individual cells [44]. Studies pertaining to whole native tissues are however more rare: they concern mainly bones [45], cartilages [46] or arteries [47,48] and usually feature only topographical data; elastic modulus properties have only been studied in a few cases [47,49]. The topography of live embryonic tissue has recently been studied with the AFM [50].…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%