2017
DOI: 10.5194/os-13-799-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface drifters in the German Bight: model validation considering windage and Stokes drift

Abstract: Abstract. Six surface drifters (drogued at about 1 m depth) deployed in the inner German Bight (North Sea) were tracked for between 9 and 54 days. Corresponding simulations were conducted offline based on surface currents from two independent models (BSHcmod and TRIM). Inclusion of a direct wind drag (0.6 % of 10 m wind) was needed for successful simulations based on BSHcmod currents archived for a 5 m depth surface layer. Adding 50 % of surface Stokes drift simulated with a third-generation wave model (WAM) w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees well with the observations of this study, which also show the highest drifter velocities for both components in tidal inlets generated by tidal jets (Figure 9, and Supplementary Video 2) which seem to overshadow the wind effects in the coastal area. These findings are also in good agreement with recent studies by Callies et al (2017) that compared trajectories of six surface drifters with results of offline particle simulations in the inner German Bight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This agrees well with the observations of this study, which also show the highest drifter velocities for both components in tidal inlets generated by tidal jets (Figure 9, and Supplementary Video 2) which seem to overshadow the wind effects in the coastal area. These findings are also in good agreement with recent studies by Callies et al (2017) that compared trajectories of six surface drifters with results of offline particle simulations in the inner German Bight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, when wave breaking is not occurring, the surface Stokes drift appears to account for much of the discrepancy between the drogued drifter velocity and the thin surface drifters. This assumes that the impact of Stokes drift on the drogued drifters is negligible, an assumption supported by the analysis of Kenyon [10], but differing from some previous studies [25,26]. A possible explanation is that the thin drifters have very small diameters, allowing them to closely follow orbital trajectories of very short surface gravity waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…10a refers to drifter A 5 that is not subject of our study on drifter pairs. Drifter A 5 travelled, however, for nearly 49 days (see Callies et al, 2017) so that the length of data recorded compares to the time span underlying the Eulerian spectrum in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Kinetic Energy Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the German Bight its horizontal resolution is 900 m. Although the vertical coordinate in BSHcmod is dynamical (Dick et al, 2008), re-gridded archived output represents surface currents in terms of the mean in an upper 5 m water column. Callies et al (2017) found that an additional wind drag in terms of 0.6 % of the 10 m wind velocity u 10m is appropriate to compensate for the lack of vertical grid resolution in archived model output. Therefore, for simulating drifter location x as function of time t, the following equation is used:…”
Section: Drifter Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation