Sustainable Tourism Development: A Critique

Liu, Zhenhua

doi:10.1080/09669580308667216

Cited by 870 publications

(622 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

555

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Integrasi tersebut dapat tercipta bila pariwisata dapat memberikan berbagai manfaat, baik sosial budaya, lingkungan, maupun ekonomi bagi masyarakat lokal. Selain itu, keberlanjutan pariwisata akan tercipta apabila mampu secara simultan memenuhi berbagai kebutuhan, termasuk kebutuhan masyarakat lokal (Liu, 2003). Sering kali penyebab munculnya permasalahan dalam pengembangan pariwisata karena terabaikannya kepentingan masyarakat tersebut.…”

Section: Pengantarunclassified

Memutus Logika Karitatif Dalam Praktik Pariwisata Di Ubud, Bali

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many villas in Ubud is located around agricultural land owned by farmers who are members of Subak. There is a deal that the villas are required to provide material contributions to local institutions, including Subak. Such contributions produce caritative framework which not in line towards the sustainability of tourism development. This paper addresses to offer the guidelines of sustainable tourism practice in Ubud, Bali. To fulfill this purpose, data has been collected from observations and interviews with selected informants and then analyzed descriptively. The analysis indicated that there is dualism perspective against agriculture, which has implications towards exclusivity in-group, especially farmers and villas. Each group attempts to maintain the dualism perspective by applying various tactics, which can lead to disharmonies relations between groups. It requires social guidance in order to reduce caritative framework by creating common tourism sphere through agrotourism.Keywords: Agrotourism; Caritative; Farmer; Ubud; Villa. ABSTRAKBanyak vila di Ubud memilih lokasi di sekitar areal pertanian milik petani yang tergabung dalam institusi Subak. Terdapat kesepakatan bahwa vila wajib memberikan bantuan atau sumbangan material ke institusi setempat, termasuk Subak. Kesepakatan menyumbang-disumbang dalam praktik pariwisata tersebut telah melahirkan logika karitatif dan jauh dari konteks keberlanjutan pembangunan pariwisata. Tulisan ini ditujukan untuk memberikan arahan bagi keberlanjutan praktik pariwisata di Ubud, Bali melalui pemutusan logika karitatif tersebut. Kebutuhan data untuk mencapai tujuan dengan observasi dan wawancara yang kemudian dibahas secara deskriptif. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa terdapat dualisme cara pandang terhadap pertanian yang berimplikasi pada aktivitas eksklusif kelompok, khususnya petani maupun vila. Setiap kelompok berupaya untuk mempertahankan eksistensi dualisme tersebut dengan menerapkan berbagai siasat, yang dapat berujung pada tata relasi konfliktual. Untuk itu dibutuhkan panduan sosial guna memutus mata rantai logika karitatif dengan membangun ranah pariwisata bersama antara petani dengan vila melalui wisata Subak atau agrowisata.

show abstract

Section: Pengantarunclassified

Memutus Logika Karitatif Dalam Praktik Pariwisata Di Ubud, Bali

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…What these studies have in common is an intention to cause positive societal change. This central tenet of the transformative paradigm (Mertens, 2007(Mertens, , 2011) also reflects the intention behind much sustainable tourism research that informs societal change (Bramwell & Lane, 2013;Liu, 2003). Cole for example spoke of the advantages of mixed methods for the activist researcher because one can adapt the content for different audiences and communication is at the heart of activism.…”

Section: Promoting Societal Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Mixed methods in sustainable tourism research: an analysis of prevalence, designs and application in JOST (2005–2014)

Molina‐Azorín

Font

2015

Journal of Sustainable Tourism

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyses the use of mixed methods in papers published in the Journal of Sustainable Tourism (JOST) over a ten year period, 2005 to 2014. The main purpose of this paper is to examine how and why mixed methods research is being used in the sustainable tourism field. First, a content analysis of the articles shows that the purposes are primarily expansion and development of the results, and less often triangulation or complementarity. Sequential designs are slightly more popular than simultaneous designs, with qualitative research preceding the quantitative element. In the majority of cases, both the quantitative and qualitative methods are equivalent in importance, yet where one is dominant this is usually the quantitative part. Second, we contextualise the content analysis by exemplifying the use of mixed methods with selected papers and interviews with their authors to reflect on the practices, reasons, strengths and weaknesses of using mixed methods. We argue that mixed methods provide sustainable tourism academics with more opportunities for pragmatic transformative research for societal change, and increases research reliability in relation to social desirability bias, stakeholder comparisons and interdisciplinarity.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the findings of previous studies reveal that when residents realize that the positive effects are likely to be greater than the negative, they do not only consent on the tourism development of their area but also they strongly support it (Andriotis, 2004;Bachleitner and Zins, 1999;Besculides et al 2002;Lotfi et al 2010;McGehee et al 2002;OECD, 2009). Finally, those employed in the tourism sector and are financially dependent on it seem to have a more positive attitude towards cultural tourism, since it can be considered as a means of preserving their cultural heritage and increasing local income as well (Brunt and Courtney, 1999;Bujosa and Rossello, 2007;Ko and Stewart, 2002;Liu, 2003;Quinn, 2007;Sdrali and Chazapi, 2007;Shin, 2010).…”

Section: The Perspective Of Local Communitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, emphasis has been given in regenerating areas and improving locals' living conditions, while promoting the cultural, historical and aesthetic characteristics of a place, thus ensuring the preservation and the promotion of its cultural assets. Therefore, the protection of architectural heritage is not limited only to the preservation of historic buildings and complexes, but extends to reusing them, integrating them into a broader contemporary urban planning and a spatial organization (Bachleitner and Zins, 1999;Bandarin et al 2011;Besculides et al 2002;Dimitsantou-Kremezi, 2006;Ivona, 2003;Liu, 2003;Matarasso, 1999;Prayag, 2009;Shin, 2010;Tomljenovic, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Cultural Heritage into Contemporary Life The Perspective of Local Communities: The Case of Arcadia, Greece

Lappa¹,

Georgitsoyanni²

2016

EJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study aims to highlight the importance of integrating cultural heritage into contemporary life as a means to contribute to the economic and tourism development of a historical area and as an asset to local development. The study focuses on the cultural goods of Arcadia in central Peloponnese, Greece, an area of great history and rich architectural heritage, which gives a distinct cultural identity to the region. The overall objective of the current research is to describe how the different kinds of cultural benefits, derived by tourism, are perceived by the local community. A questionnaire based survey, conducted in Arcadia during the period 2012-2014, demonstrates that the locals strongly support the promotion of the architectural richness of the region in order to become an attraction for visitors, contributing both to the improvement of the quality of life, as well as the economic and tourism development of the area. The survey results confirm that cultural tourism is seen as an opportunity to contribute to the economic and cultural sustainability of the area and the local community. The implementation of a linear regression model shows that education is the key factor influencing the residents' view regarding the promotion of cultural tourism in the region.

show abstract

Sustainable Tourism Development: A Critique

Cited by 870 publications

References 34 publications

Memutus Logika Karitatif Dalam Praktik Pariwisata Di Ubud, Bali

Memutus Logika Karitatif Dalam Praktik Pariwisata Di Ubud, Bali

Mixed methods in sustainable tourism research: an analysis of prevalence, designs and application in JOST (2005–2014)

Integrating Cultural Heritage into Contemporary Life The Perspective of Local Communities: The Case of Arcadia, Greece

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About