2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temperature peak-shift correction methods for NaI(Tl) and LaBr3(Ce) gamma-ray spectrum stabilisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The photomultiplier tube (PMT) of NaI(Tl) detector is very sensitive to changes in temperature of surroundings (Casanovas et al, 2012). In order to limit this effect, room temperature was maintained in an approximate range of 21-23°C during its operation, and the measurements were not taken for a very long time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The photomultiplier tube (PMT) of NaI(Tl) detector is very sensitive to changes in temperature of surroundings (Casanovas et al, 2012). In order to limit this effect, room temperature was maintained in an approximate range of 21-23°C during its operation, and the measurements were not taken for a very long time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of a short time operation in outdoor environment, this technique is not subjected to a significant temperature variation; therefore, it can be operated in the same way as in laboratory. For their continuous operation in outdoor environment, as in the case of continuous monitoring of environmental radiation, they are likely to be impacted by temperature effect [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the low resolution, the temperature effect is one of the major drawbacks of NaI(Tl) based systems, or for that matter, of all scintillation spectrometers [7]. This effect is derived from the complex temperature dependence of the system [8,9] including temperature dependence of the scintillator's light output [7] and decay time constants [10], the photomultiplier tube's temperature drift [11] and the associated electronic components' temperature behaviour [5]. The most significant contribution of the temperature effect coming from the photomultiplier tube is too difficult to handle [12], so the spectrum processing methods would be the most beneficial way to correct the temperature effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of external variations on parameters such as temperature and pressure on NaI scintillator behavior was investigated in a lot of studies (Casanovas et al, 2012(Casanovas et al, , 2013Ianakiev et al, 2007, 2009, Moszyński et al, 2006. But, in the case of low background detectors, these discrepancies are due to channel shifting in the spectra by changing the measurement time and temperature; which worsens the resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%