Abstract:It is demonstrated that phytochrome-mediated anthocyanin synthesis in the epidermal cells of mustard seedling cotyledons takes place only 27 h after sowing onwards (at 25°C). This "starting point" cannot be shifted by light treatments or by nutrients. The late appearance of competence for P fr (P r and P fr, red- and far-red absorbing forms of phytochrome, respectively) with regard to anthocyanin synthesis is not related to the phytochrome system per se (P r⇆P fr) as this is fully functional immediately after … Show more
“…The level of anthocyanin formed under the sequences (b) and (c) is never as low as that of the dark controls; it is usually higher, showing that the photoreversibility of the effect of the light pretreatment is not complete. The only case in which a short terminal FR treatment can fully reverse the effect of a prolonged light pretreatment is when the latter is applied during the period when the biological system has not yet attained the competence for anthocyanin production in response to light (MOHR 1978, STEINITZ and BERGFELD 1977, STEINITZ et al 1976. The cause for this light-induced increase of the responsiveness to Pfr and for the change in the time course of responsiveness (SCHMIDT and MOHR 1981) is not yet understood.…”
Section: Anthocyanin Production Under Inductive Conditionsmentioning
“…The level of anthocyanin formed under the sequences (b) and (c) is never as low as that of the dark controls; it is usually higher, showing that the photoreversibility of the effect of the light pretreatment is not complete. The only case in which a short terminal FR treatment can fully reverse the effect of a prolonged light pretreatment is when the latter is applied during the period when the biological system has not yet attained the competence for anthocyanin production in response to light (MOHR 1978, STEINITZ and BERGFELD 1977, STEINITZ et al 1976. The cause for this light-induced increase of the responsiveness to Pfr and for the change in the time course of responsiveness (SCHMIDT and MOHR 1981) is not yet understood.…”
Section: Anthocyanin Production Under Inductive Conditionsmentioning
“…Experiments to determine anthocyanin levels support these results: lower amounts of anthocyanin were obtained after an RG9 pulse than in the dark control (Oelmfiller and Mohr 1984). Anthocyanin is inducible even when light-pulse treatments are given earlier than 6 h after sowing (Steinitz et al 1976;Oelmiiller and Mohr 1984). These effects cannot be due to labile Pfr as this has too short a half-life (45-55 min) in mustard (Marm6 et al 1971).…”
Section: P H Y T O C H R O M E Is O F P R I M a R Y I M P O R T A N Cmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The control o f the e n d o g e n o u s development p r o g r a m by p h y t o c h r o m e is evident from, for example, the specific starting points for the p h y t o c h r o m ed e p e n d e n t a p p e a r a n c e o f different transcripts ( W e n n g et al 1990) and enzymes (Schopfer 1984) in m u s t a r d seedlings, The starting point for C H S -t r a n s c r i p t a c c u m u l a t i o n is at a b o u t 24 h after sowing, which is similar to the time point previously determined for increases in C H S enzyme activity (Br6denfeldt and M o h r 1988). On an endp r o d u c t level, the starting p o i n t for a n t h o c y a n i n accum u l a t i o n is 3 h (Br6denfeldt and M o h r 1988; Oelmfiller and M o h r 1984; Steinitz et al 1976), and for quercetin f o r m a t i o n 6 h later (Br6denfeldt and M o h r 1988). In the case of anthocyanins, irradiation with cFR indicates the involvement of an HIR (Lange et al 1971 ;Steinitz et al 1976) as do the transcript measurements presented here.…”
Section: Expression Of Schs1 and Schs2 In Tissues Other Than Cotyledonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On an endp r o d u c t level, the starting p o i n t for a n t h o c y a n i n accum u l a t i o n is 3 h (Br6denfeldt and M o h r 1988; Oelmfiller and M o h r 1984; Steinitz et al 1976), and for quercetin f o r m a t i o n 6 h later (Br6denfeldt and M o h r 1988). In the case of anthocyanins, irradiation with cFR indicates the involvement of an HIR (Lange et al 1971 ;Steinitz et al 1976) as do the transcript measurements presented here. Accumulation of CHS mRNA also occurs in dark-grown seedlings between 36-42 h after sowing.…”
Section: Expression Of Schs1 and Schs2 In Tissues Other Than Cotyledonsmentioning
Two different chalcone synthase (CHS) transcripts show similar expression characteristics under different light regimes in cotyledons of mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Etiolated seedlings show an increase in dark-expression 36-42 h after sowing. Under continuous red or far-red irradiation both CHS transcripts start to accumulate to levels above those of the dark control at 24-27 h after sowing. This time point can therefore be considered as the starting (or competence) point for phytochrome control of CHS. Continuous far-red irradiation stimulates transcript accumulation more than red light, indicating the involvement of a high-irradiance response (HIR). Irradiation of etiolated seedlings with 5 min long-wavelength far-red light (RG9) at 6-21 h after sowing decreases CHS-mRNA levels below those of the dark control. It is concluded that CHS dark-expression in etiolated seedlings is controlled by a pool of stabletype phytochrome which is derived from seed tissue. By contrast, an RG9-light pulse given to etiolated seedlings 30 h after sowing causes accumulation of CHS-mRNA above the dark-control level. This response and the HIR are attributed to the action of labile phytochrome for which the seedling becomes competent at the starting point 24-27 h after sowing. The different starting points for CHS-mRNA expression in darkness and in light (36 h and 24 h, respectively, after sowing) also indicate that the tested CHS genes in mustard are under the photocontrol of two distinct phytochrome pools. Northern analysis shows that both CHS-mRNAs are expressed in primary leaves, epicotyls and young flower buds. In-situ hybridization with gene-specific CHS probes reveals similar expression patterns for both transcripts in cotyledons of seedlings grown under 42 h continuous far-red light.
“…This observation (data not shown) makes it unlikely that UV/blue light photoreceptors are involved in CHS expression in mustard cotyledons. These effects were also described for anthocyanin accumulation [35,58].…”
Section: Phytochrome-regulated Expression Of the Chs Genementioning
Genomic DNA from mustard was cloned in EMBL4 and screened for chalcone synthase (CHS) genes using a heterologous cDNA probe from parsley. Two clones which hybridized with the parsley cDNA probe were isolated. They showed different restriction patterns. One clone was sequenced and identified as a CHS gene by sequence comparison with published CHS sequences. The sequence of the coding region is 1188 bp, and encodes a protein of 43 kDa. The start-point of transcription was determined by primer extension. The sequence of 0.9 kbp at the 5' end of the transcription start and part of the noncoding 3' of this gene were also determined. The coding sequence is interrupted by a single intron of 523 bp. The coding and the noncoding 5' sequence of this gene was compared with CHS genes from other species. A very high homology was found with the Arabidopsis CHS coding region. A sequence motif (CACGTGT) which is present in most rbcS and all CHS upstream regions, and which specifically binds a protein factor from plant nuclear extracts, is also present in the upstream region of the mustard CHS gene. Measurements of CHS transcript levels show that phytochrome controls expression of this gene in cotyledons of mustard seedlings; however, blue/UV-light photoreceptors control expression in later stages of development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.