1974
DOI: 10.1177/00359157740676p127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Assessment of Disability Caused by Severe Head Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first priorities, therefore, was to devise rating scales that might be used to chart progress in brain injury rehabilitation , to be used alongside traditional neuropsychological measures (although even the latter at that time could be considered rather primitive by today's standards). It was decided to use the Chessington Physical Assessment (see Evans et al, 1974), which has since proved consistently helpful: It makes no assumptions about the neurological causes of physical deficits, but scores functional performance in a range of basic movements ("Locomotor Abilities"), the ability to control movements at central and peripheral joints ("Dynamic Interference by Abnormal Tone"), and various aspects of sensation ("Joint Position Sense" and "Superficial and Deep Sensation"). All score levels are pre-defined, so that the assessment qualifies as "objective".…”
Section: The Development Of Ideas About Measurement Of Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first priorities, therefore, was to devise rating scales that might be used to chart progress in brain injury rehabilitation , to be used alongside traditional neuropsychological measures (although even the latter at that time could be considered rather primitive by today's standards). It was decided to use the Chessington Physical Assessment (see Evans et al, 1974), which has since proved consistently helpful: It makes no assumptions about the neurological causes of physical deficits, but scores functional performance in a range of basic movements ("Locomotor Abilities"), the ability to control movements at central and peripheral joints ("Dynamic Interference by Abnormal Tone"), and various aspects of sensation ("Joint Position Sense" and "Superficial and Deep Sensation"). All score levels are pre-defined, so that the assessment qualifies as "objective".…”
Section: The Development Of Ideas About Measurement Of Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the Joint Services Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Chessington, there is provision for 40 long stay beds with full nursing care for severely disabled patients in a specially adapted medical centre. Many of these patients are suffering from the sequele of severe head injuries and this is the subject of a communication by Wing Commander C D Evans (Evans et al 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%