1999
DOI: 10.1108/10610429910272484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The brand accounting side‐show

Abstract: Examines the various brand asset recognition methods used by the accounting profession, within their existing rules, to highlight, first, the restrictive nature of a brand asset's current attachment to purchased goodwill and, second, the restrictive requirement for brand asset recognition to be derived solely from a``transaction or event''. Then examines the latest rule change, FRS10, to assess whether the recognition of brand assets is likely to remain restrictive in the future. It concurs with Murphy's view … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interbrand utilizes industry feedback and market research to examine the role of the brand in the company"s sales, develop an assessment of the brand"s strength and future risk, and conclude with an overall brand value. Interbrand uses their technique to satisfy the valuation needs of its customers, as well as in the production of its annual list of the best global brands in partnership with the publications Financial World and Business Week and the effectiveness of the Interbrand valuation method has been noted by numerous researchers including Farquhar 1989;Keller 1993;Tollington 1999;and Seetharaman et al 2001. For the independent variables, secondary data has been collected and collated using publicly available annual reports and 10-K forms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interbrand utilizes industry feedback and market research to examine the role of the brand in the company"s sales, develop an assessment of the brand"s strength and future risk, and conclude with an overall brand value. Interbrand uses their technique to satisfy the valuation needs of its customers, as well as in the production of its annual list of the best global brands in partnership with the publications Financial World and Business Week and the effectiveness of the Interbrand valuation method has been noted by numerous researchers including Farquhar 1989;Keller 1993;Tollington 1999;and Seetharaman et al 2001. For the independent variables, secondary data has been collected and collated using publicly available annual reports and 10-K forms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential unit price of the brand in comparison with a generic product is the valuation technique known as "Price premium" (Ambler & Barwise, 1998;Tollington, 1999;Smith & Parr, 2000; company (Damodaran, 1996;Fernandez, 2001). According to the comparison of financial profitability, this study has found two different methods of brand valuation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, purchased brand valuations often rely upon discounted cashflow techniques provided that such valuations do not breach the amount of goodwill, purchased as part of a business transaction. The DCF value is therefore constrained by the original/historic cost, that is, transaction-based cost of goodwill (see Tollington, 1999). The above``economic benefit/transaction'' linkage of ideas is thereby not only reinforced, it also shows first, the dominance of a transaction-based HC over DCF approaches and second, the reluctance of the accounting profession to move away from a traditional double entry, original/historic cost, transaction-based view of the balance sheet.…”
Section: Cognitive Assumptions Underlying the Existing Definitions Of An Asset And The Problems Associated With Themmentioning
confidence: 99%