2009
DOI: 10.1179/174227109x12500735818025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cellular Bioeffects of Low Intensity Ultrasound

Abstract: A wide range of non-lethal cellular effects of low intensity ultrasound have been demonstrated in the literature. In order to utilise these effects therapeutically, the underlying interaction mechanisms of ultrasound with cells, and the cellular processes involved in these interactions must be understood. This article reviews recent work on cellular bioeffects using both cell culture and in vivo animal models. We also discuss our current understanding of cellular effects and processes involved in thermosensing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the therapeutic potential of LIPUS and sonoporation is well recognized, the biological grounding in our current scientific understanding of these two phenomena has remained to be critically weak. In the case of LIPUS, its stimulatory benefits are sometimes controversial [10]- [12], and a stronger knowledge of the underlying biological mechanisms is necessary to corroborate the surmised therapeutic value [13], [14]. In the case of sonoporation, its practical efficiency is deemed to be mediocre [15], [16], and the pursuit of detailed knowledge on the pertinent cellular bioeffects is seemingly essential to devise strategies for improving the overall efficiency of this membrane perforation approach [17], [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the therapeutic potential of LIPUS and sonoporation is well recognized, the biological grounding in our current scientific understanding of these two phenomena has remained to be critically weak. In the case of LIPUS, its stimulatory benefits are sometimes controversial [10]- [12], and a stronger knowledge of the underlying biological mechanisms is necessary to corroborate the surmised therapeutic value [13], [14]. In the case of sonoporation, its practical efficiency is deemed to be mediocre [15], [16], and the pursuit of detailed knowledge on the pertinent cellular bioeffects is seemingly essential to devise strategies for improving the overall efficiency of this membrane perforation approach [17], [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), as a physical stimulus, has the advantages of being non-invasive, portable, and targeted. Research shows that LIPUS can promote cell proliferation and differentiation in fibroblasts, Schwann cells, and other cell types [ 13 ], inhibit bone loss in ovariectomized rats or induced by weightlessness [ 14 , 15 ], and accelerate the fracture repair process [ 15 , 16 ]. Muscle atrophy is often accompanied by disorders of protein metabolism in muscle tissue, the increased decomposition of muscle protein, and the thinning or even disappearance of muscle fibers [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIPUS is used for stimulating healing in different tissues for a variety of applications, especially in rehabilitation medicine, bone-fracture healing, soft-tissue regeneration, and inflammatory responses inhibition. At a cellular level, LIPUS has also been observed to increase migration and proliferation of aortic endothelial cells, proliferation of fibroblasts, Schwann cells, and other cell types [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%