2009
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.109728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Utility of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Cardiovascular Disease and the Potential Implication of JUPITER on Current Practice Guidelines

Abstract: Background: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) testing is relatively inexpensive and has been shown to predict the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in multiple patient groups, including those treated with statin therapy. JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) is a recently completed large multicenter randomized clinical trial that tested whether statin therapy should be given to apparently healthy individuals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to previous reports, but many of those children reported previously already showed significant comorbidities, which our subjects did not (9, 31, 35). Polymorphisms of the CRP gene that cause higher CRP concentrations are associated with even greater cardiovascular risk (36), and the administration of statins to individuals with high hsCRP but without dyslipidemia was associated with marked reduction in the incidence of major coronary and neurovascular events in a large cohort of adults (37,38). In this context the increases in IL-6 and hsCRP reported here were remarkable because even the younger prepubertal cohort showed a more than 10-fold elevation in hsCRP concentrations compared with the lean counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to previous reports, but many of those children reported previously already showed significant comorbidities, which our subjects did not (9, 31, 35). Polymorphisms of the CRP gene that cause higher CRP concentrations are associated with even greater cardiovascular risk (36), and the administration of statins to individuals with high hsCRP but without dyslipidemia was associated with marked reduction in the incidence of major coronary and neurovascular events in a large cohort of adults (37,38). In this context the increases in IL-6 and hsCRP reported here were remarkable because even the younger prepubertal cohort showed a more than 10-fold elevation in hsCRP concentrations compared with the lean counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hsCRP and fibrinogen concentrations have been shown to predict cardiovascular disease in many groups of patients (38) and appear to be more robust analytes than other markers such as IL-6, which has a shorter half-life. CRP itself has been implicated in endothelial dysfunction (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no reports have been published analyzing the peri-operative changes of CRP by using the ultra-sensible method (hsCRP). hsCRP has been introduced in clinical routine as an independent predictor of acute myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death risk (48). hsCRP detection could be an interesting tool to better discriminate the inflammatory pattern between conventional and MIS approaches.…”
Section: Acute Phase Proteins and Classical Inflammatory Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statins, which are primarily advocated as lipid-lowering drug, have been also credited with anti-inflammatory properties [8]. However, clinical trials that are into investigating the long-term benefits of statins such as the JUPITER [9] and PROSPER [10] have shown discrepant findings on the additional value of CRP as a risk predictor in comparison to the prevailing conventional predictors of risk. The outcome of clinical trials is governed by many factors amongst which the design of the trial is a key consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%