1979
DOI: 10.1016/0015-0568(79)90032-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dependence of the strength of carbon fibres on length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brittle fibers such as carbon and glass exhibit a strength size effect due to flaws in the microstructure of the fibers; tensile strength increases with reduced fiber diameter and gauge length, respectively. 10,11) Fabric architecture is also important to discuss mechanical properties of the composites. The multi-dimensional weave can easily create pockets where voids can be trapped or cracks can initiate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brittle fibers such as carbon and glass exhibit a strength size effect due to flaws in the microstructure of the fibers; tensile strength increases with reduced fiber diameter and gauge length, respectively. 10,11) Fabric architecture is also important to discuss mechanical properties of the composites. The multi-dimensional weave can easily create pockets where voids can be trapped or cracks can initiate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Specifically the recent attention is paid on the following factors: (1) inside sub-micron flaws, (2) microstructure, (3) stress gradient and (4) test considerations. This technique cannot be established understanding of the influence of theses factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve good extrapolation results, fiber tensile tests should be performed at many different gage lengths (at least seven), and there should be a sample size of about 20 for each gage length (Asloun et al 1989). The validity of this method was confirmed in previously published data (Manders and Chou 1983;Goggin 1975;Barry 1978;Hitchon and Phillips 1979;Jones et al 1980 overestimated since only the strong fibers are extracted for tensile tests. Weak fibers break prior to testing and are discarded during sample preparation.…”
Section: Statistical Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…23,25 The difference in shape parameters reflects the flaw distribution in the material. In case of a homogeneous flaw distribution throughout the material the shape parameter will have high values.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%