Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference 1974
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01921-2_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Determination of the Volumetric Accuracy of Multi Axis Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first type of methods is the kinematic (or element) approach as seen in the work done by Love and Scarr, 13 DufEe and Malmberg. 2 The second method is the workspace approach, such as the works done by Leete 10 Jan, Chu and Liu.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type of methods is the kinematic (or element) approach as seen in the work done by Love and Scarr, 13 DufEe and Malmberg. 2 The second method is the workspace approach, such as the works done by Leete 10 Jan, Chu and Liu.…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of modeling methods has been experienced many years and it turns out to be various kinds such as matrix translation method, error matrix method, rigid body kinematic, D-H method, model methods based on the multi-body system kinematics theory and so on. In 1973 Love and Scarr obtained the combined effects of the elemental errors in the machine tool and then developed the volumetric errors of a multi-axis machine by using the trigonometric technique [25]. In 1977 a matrix translation method was reported and a calibration technique using three-dimensional metrology on a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was presented by Hocken et al [13].…”
Section: Accuracy Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these difficulties, corrective software can be used to compensate for the hardware imperfections. Since the 1970s, software-based error compensation schemes have blossomed (Love & Scarr, 1973;Bush, Kunzmann, & Waldele, 1984;Tan, Lee, Lim, Dou, & Seet, 1999a). Common to all these works and more is a model of the machine errors (see Hayati, 1983;Veitschnegger & Wu, 1986;Zhang, Veale, Charlton, Hocken, & Borchardt, 1985;Duffie & Maimberg, 1987;Weekers & Schellekens, 1995), which is either implicitly or explicitly used in the compensator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%