2010 IEEE Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/async.2010.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Devolution of Synchronizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, was believed to improve with technology scaling [4]. However, recent measurements [5] [6] indicate that scaling trends of synchronizers should be re-considered: The need to obtain full characterization may be imperative in technologies beyond 45nm. Because of this, simulation methods that can reliably predict measurements are growing in importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, was believed to improve with technology scaling [4]. However, recent measurements [5] [6] indicate that scaling trends of synchronizers should be re-considered: The need to obtain full characterization may be imperative in technologies beyond 45nm. Because of this, simulation methods that can reliably predict measurements are growing in importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the rounding between the constant and logarithmic behaviors is solely determined by the chosen sigmoid equation, the¯tting process reported in all cases. [12][13][14] Similarly, a strong dependence of temperature and voltage on the metastability parameters has been reported. 15 These e®ects, however, are somewhat orthogonal to the line of arguments that we followed in this paper: Changing parameters sets (for the same underlying type of behavior) can be easily accommodated in our model without changing its fundamental structure or the key observations that we reported above.…”
Section: Model¯ttingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have been translated into convenient rules of thumb for designers. As digital circuits have become more complex, denser and faster with reduced power consumption, the old rules of thumb are beginning to fail [ 3][ 4], especially when adding process variations and operating-condition sensitivities in today's manufacturing technologies [ 5]. One rule of thumb has stated that the time constant is proportional to the fan-out of four (FO4) propagation delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rule of thumb thus predicts that decreases with feature size and FO4 gate delay. However, a change in this pattern is emerging at process nodes 90nm and below [ 3][ 4] [ 6]. This change is particularly significant when the metastable voltage (typically about ½ ) is in the vicinity of the transistor threshold voltage, an increasingly common occurrence for low-power circuits employing lower supply voltage and high threshold transistors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%