2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3836147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Disastrous Effects of Leaders in Denial: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Bolsonaro was not affiliated with a political party in the 2020 election, his supporters may not have had a strong preference for candidates running in local races. Thus, Bolsonaro's messages could influence both the spread of the disease (Ajzenman, Cavalcanti and Da Mata, 2020; Cabral, Pongeluppe and Ito, 2021; Leone, 2021; Fernandes et al., 2020) and electoral abstention. For this reason, we include in our models the vote share that Bolsonaro received in the 2018 presidential election as a proxy for his support in the municipality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since Bolsonaro was not affiliated with a political party in the 2020 election, his supporters may not have had a strong preference for candidates running in local races. Thus, Bolsonaro's messages could influence both the spread of the disease (Ajzenman, Cavalcanti and Da Mata, 2020; Cabral, Pongeluppe and Ito, 2021; Leone, 2021; Fernandes et al., 2020) and electoral abstention. For this reason, we include in our models the vote share that Bolsonaro received in the 2018 presidential election as a proxy for his support in the municipality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived costs and benefits are likely shaped by political messaging, especially by co‐partisan messengers, and may thus fall along political lines (Samuels and Zucco Jr., 2018). Bolsonaro's politicization and rejection of Covid‐19 may have led his supporters to perceive fewer health risks; scholars found evidence that Bolsonaro's communications reduced social distancing behavior and increased case and death rates in areas where he had more supporters (Ajzenman, Cavalcanti and Da Mata, 2020; Cabral, Pongeluppe and Ito, 2021; Leone, 2021; Fernandes et al., 2020). However, it is unclear how negative personal experience with the virus—a key determinant of the severity of risk perceptions—would affect participation in a polarized environment.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…COVID-19 revealed a lack of adequate policies, preparedness, and education necessary to combat a pandemic and control further outbreaks [42][43][44]. Further, the implementation of rapid pandemic control measures was at times delayed [45]. Our results indicate that the policies and actions implemented by healthcare facilities and public health agencies were insu cient and many physicians recommended a need to strengthen healthcare and political systems to better respond to pandemics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One study indicated a higher number of cases and deaths from Covid-19 in cities where President Jair Bolsonaro had emerged victorious in the 2018 elections, furthermore demonstrating a worsening of cases and deaths after speeches relativizing pandemic care and encouraging the use of unproven medications in cities where there was broad support for Bolsonaro compared to cities where there was little support for him (Cabral et al, 2021). In addition, studies developed in Brazil have shown on the one hand a mediation of conspiratorial beliefs between political orientation and vaccination intention (Galli & Modesto, 2021), and on the other hand, a direct relationship between political orientation and engagement in social isolation measures (Modesto et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%