1968
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of cholinesterase inhibitors on the body temperature of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, chlorpromazine hypothermia appears to be brought about by a less selective action, being accompanied by large increases in tail blood flow and a loss of piloerection (Kollias & Bullard, 1964). The mechanism of DEF-induced hypothermia would appear to be quite distinct from that produced by cholinomimetics such as oxytremorine or anticholinesterases such as soman since these are both blocked by atropine (Maikel, 1970;Meeter & Walthius, 1968). The finding that the falls in body temperature could be largely prevented by large intraperitoneal injections of noradrenaline, and that DEFtreated animals could increase their oxygen consumption normally in response to such injections, clearly suggested that the inhibition of thermogenesis was not due to lack of metabolic capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, chlorpromazine hypothermia appears to be brought about by a less selective action, being accompanied by large increases in tail blood flow and a loss of piloerection (Kollias & Bullard, 1964). The mechanism of DEF-induced hypothermia would appear to be quite distinct from that produced by cholinomimetics such as oxytremorine or anticholinesterases such as soman since these are both blocked by atropine (Maikel, 1970;Meeter & Walthius, 1968). The finding that the falls in body temperature could be largely prevented by large intraperitoneal injections of noradrenaline, and that DEFtreated animals could increase their oxygen consumption normally in response to such injections, clearly suggested that the inhibition of thermogenesis was not due to lack of metabolic capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several data to support the latter hypothesis, although the mechanisms by which this occurs in the POAH have not been clearly delineated. It was demonstrated as early as the 1960s by Meeter (1969) that increased tail skin blood flow is an important avenue of heat loss for the development of hypothermia in OP-poisoned rats. Following i.v.…”
Section: Hypothermiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…injection of soman, rats displayed a rapid increase in tail skin temperature that preceded a drop in T c to ∼ 32°C -when the tail was wrapped in pre-heated cotton wool to reduce heat loss through this organ the rate of hypothermia development was reduced, indicating that this was an important organ for heat exchange (Meeter, 1969). To determine the regulated nature of this response, the rats were externally heated with a 60 W light bulb and reflexive adjustments in tail skin blood flow were recorded -once T c was raised from 32 to ∼ 33°C, rat tail skin temperature increased abruptly as a reflexive mechanism to return it to its previous hypothermic level (Meeter, 1969). These studies are similar to those conducted by Liebermeister (see previous section on thermoregulatory control) on fever and suggest that OP-induced hypothermia represents a regulated reduction in response to a decrease in the thermal setpoint.…”
Section: Hypothermiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then abundant evidence has been obtained in support of this suggestion in a number of mammals by studying the effects of cholinomimetic substances on body temperature following their injection into the cerebral ventricles or into different regions of the hypothalamus. Experiments of this kind were done in mice (Friedman & Jaffe, 1969), rats (Hulst & de Wied, 1967;Meeter & Wolthuis, 1968;Myers & Yaksh, 1968;Lomax, Foster & Kirkpatrick, 1969;Meeter, 1969Meeter, , 1971Avery, 1972;Baird & Lang, 1973), sheep, goats and rabbits (Bligh, Cottle & Maskrey, 1971), cats (Baird & Lang, 1973) and monkeys (Myers & Yaksh, 1969). The nature of the thermoregulatory response to cholinomimetic substances was found to differ in different species and to be dependent on the dose of the substance injected, the ambient temperature, and when injected into the hypothalamus on the actual site of injection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%