2013
DOI: 10.1111/rda.12238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Hoechst 33342 Staining and the Male Sample Donor on the Sorting Efficiency of Canine Spermatozoa

Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of Hoechst 33342 (H-42) concentration and of the male donor on the efficiency of sex-sorting procedure in canine spermatozoa. Semen samples from six dogs (three ejaculates/dog) were diluted to 100 × 10(6) sperm/ml, split into four aliquots, stained with increasing H-42 concentrations (5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5 μl, respectively) and sorted by flow cytometry. The rates of non-viable (FDA+), oriented (OS) and selected spermatozoa (SS), as well as the average sorting r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Rodenas et al . ), the technique for AI and the high‐dose insemination of the number of sex‐sorted sperm preclude the practical application of this procedure at the farm level. The present study was to perform a successful procedure for AI with sex‐sorted dog spermatozoa in farm conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Rodenas et al . ), the technique for AI and the high‐dose insemination of the number of sex‐sorted sperm preclude the practical application of this procedure at the farm level. The present study was to perform a successful procedure for AI with sex‐sorted dog spermatozoa in farm conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the ejaculates used in this study met the following quality criteria: at least 75% total motility, 60% progressive motility and 80% normal morphology (Rodenas et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing five ejaculates from three of the bad sperm sorter boars, the percentage of the ejaculates not exhibiting a well-defined split ranged between 20% and 70% (intraboar variability) [10]. Such variability in pigs, unlike other species (dogs, horses) [12,13], is not influenced by the percentage of non-viable spermatozoa in the semen samples but is closely related to ejaculate sperm concentration. Ejaculates are diluted to achieve the optimal sperm concentration for Hoechst 33342 (Ho) staining; during the staining step, samples from ejaculates with low sperm concentration would have a high proportion of seminal plasma that may alter Ho entrance into the sperm cell thereby affecting the effectiveness of DNA staining [10,11].…”
Section: Factors Limiting the Large-scale Use Of Sexed Boar Spermatozoamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Sperm viability was evaluated by simultaneous cytometric assessment of the plasma and acrosomal membrane’s integrity using a triple-fluorescence procedure, as described previously by Ródenas et al [20] and modified slightly. Briefly, 2 × 10 6 spermatozoa were transferred to tubes containing 50 µl of TFC-Ext, 4 µl of H-42 (0.05 mg/ml in PBS), 1 µl of propidium iodide (PI, 0.5 mg/ml in PBS, Invitrogen; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and 2 µl of fluorescein-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA-FITC, 20 µg/ml in PBS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%