2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The establishment of a cross-regional differentiated ecological compensation scheme based on the benefit areas and benefit levels of sand-stabilization ecosystem service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, most of the studies on ecosystem service flows focus on water ecosystem services, because the spatial flow processes and transfer paths can be better quantitatively analyzed and simulated [88]. There are also some studies that depict the sand control ecosystem service flows [38,81]. In this study, although the CS flows in Yantai showed a decaying pattern in space, the directional differences between counties were significant.…”
Section: The Direction Of Ecosystem Service Flows and Its Policy Respmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Currently, most of the studies on ecosystem service flows focus on water ecosystem services, because the spatial flow processes and transfer paths can be better quantitatively analyzed and simulated [88]. There are also some studies that depict the sand control ecosystem service flows [38,81]. In this study, although the CS flows in Yantai showed a decaying pattern in space, the directional differences between counties were significant.…”
Section: The Direction Of Ecosystem Service Flows and Its Policy Respmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast to the internationally popular PES, the concept of ecological compensation (EC) is currently used in China [35][36][37][38][39][40]. The concept of EC is essentially the same as that of PES [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At present, China adopts a government-led EC mechanism, in which the most common method of government support in river basin EC is to establish an EC fund jointly funded by stakeholders [19]. This method can solve the problem of cross-regional EC to some extent, but due to the limitation of administrative region, compensation often occurred at the provincial level or municipal level, which resulted in the lack of more detailed scientific research on the specific scope of EC [20]. Milder et al pointed out that the existing instances of PES benefiting the poor have been limited mainly to specific localities, small-scale projects, and a handful of broader government programs [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%