The Heritage of Cross Cultural Management Research

Abstract

Cross cultural research has made a number of contributions to social thought and has a number of limitations that suggest directions for future work. Understanding the current state and potential future of the field requires understanding how the history of culture analysis has shaped what we as scholars do and what our audience hears. That sort of understanding influences the significance of establishing a Hofstede Chair in Cultural Diversity at Maastricht University as well as influencing the purposes for which the chair should be used.

Bahasa, Batik, and Bargaining: An Exploratory Study of the Negotiation Styles and Behaviors of Indonesian Managers

“…The empirical national cultural research conducted by the GLOBE Project (61 nations) and Hofstede study (72 nations) produced scores that orientated Indonesia along each of the cultural dimensions as compared to other nations in the studies (House et al, 2004;Hofstede, 2001). Both these studies cover a large cross-section of nations, across all continents, and as such provide good evidence for cultural positioning of Indonesian managers within a broader cross cultural context (Peterson, 2007). The GLOBE project cultural dimensions are scored on a scale between one and seven, with a midpoint of four (House et al, 2004).…”

Ngamuk Dan Psikoterapi Mawas Diri Suryomentaram

“…teori ilmu pengetahuan Barat yang selalu Hofstede dalam tulisannya mengenai menuntut kuantifikasi dan rasionalisasi, bagaimana mengelola penelitian lintas perilaku ngamuk ini akan lebih tepat budaya, mengajukan delapan cara untuk dipahami dalam konsep rasa, seperti filosofi mengatasi kesenjangan teori yang berbasis mawas diri Suryomentaram. budaya (Peterson, 2007): 1. Mengklarifikasi hubungan individu…”