8In recent years individual differences in the behavior of animals, or personalities, have been 9 shown to influence the response of individuals to changing environments and have important 10 ecological implications. As researchers strive to understand and predict the responses of 11 individuals and populations to anthropogenic changes, personality studies in wild populations 12 will likely continue to increase. Studies of personality in wild populations often require that 13 animals are live-trapped before behavioral observation can occur; however, it is unknown what 14 impact live trapping may have on the behavior of trapped individuals. Specifically, if the 15 duration of trap confinement directly influences behavior, then by obtaining wild animals 16 through live-trapping are we confounding the very measurements we are most interested in? To 17 investigate this question, we performed a study using two small mammal species. We positioned 18 high-definition trail cameras on Longworth small mammal traps in the field to observe capture 19 events and record the time of capture. We then measured personality in captured deer mice 20 (Peromyscus maniculatus) and southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) using three 21 standardized tests. With a repeatability analysis, we confirmed which behaviors could be 22 considered personality traits, and through linear and generalized linear models, we found that the 23 time an animal had spent confined to a trap before testing did not affect the majority of behaviors 24 exhibited. Our results showed two weak behavioral effects of confinement duration on boldness 25 and docility depending on whether an individual had been trapped previously. Our results 26 suggest that personality measurements of wild, trapped small mammals are not determined by 27 trapping procedures, but that researchers should control for whether an animal is naïve to 28 trapping during analysis.Over the past few decades, the acknowledgement that many species of animals display 32 consistent individual differences in behavior, or personalities, has become widespread (1-4).
33Personalities are heritable (5), have consequences for fitness (6-9), and can limit the ability of 34 individuals to exhibit behavioral plasticity (10) resulting in trade-offs where certain personality 35 types perform well in some ecological contexts but not in others (11). Because individual 36 personalities can determine the response of individuals to changing environments (12,13) and 37 have important ecological implications (14-16), personality studies in wild populations will 38 likely continue to increase as researchers strive to understand and predict the responses of 39 individuals and populations to anthropogenic changes (17)(18)(19)(20).
40Studies of personality in wild populations usually require that wild animals are live-41 trapped so that one or more standardized behavioral tests can be undertaken (21-24) but see (25) 42 for a method of personality observation in non-captured animals. Because being trapped may 43 induce st...