Advances in Unsaturated Geotechnics 2000
DOI: 10.1061/40510(287)8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Influence of the Compaction Energy on the SWCC of a Residual Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated air entry point fairly evolves with the compaction energy, giving a value of 1.1MPa for the modified proctor, and a relatively lower value under 1MPa for the normal proctor. This type of result is corroborated by other studies [9,10] find in the literature. The main difference between the two curves comes from their respective densities.…”
Section: Retention Curvessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The estimated air entry point fairly evolves with the compaction energy, giving a value of 1.1MPa for the modified proctor, and a relatively lower value under 1MPa for the normal proctor. This type of result is corroborated by other studies [9,10] find in the literature. The main difference between the two curves comes from their respective densities.…”
Section: Retention Curvessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although the difference in SWRCs obtained for samples compacted on the dry side and at OMC can be explained by invoking the void ratio dependency (Gallipoli et al, 2003), the same cannot be said for the wet side of the OMC that is affected by the change in structure. The same experimental evidence was given for dynamically compacted residual soil tested with different compaction efforts (Marinho and Stuermer, 2000). This highlights that differences in the degree of saturation and suction observed at different compaction states are likely to be independent of the different compaction procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Their test results showed that the soil suction of the soil that compacted at the same molding water content increased as the compaction energy increased. However, a different trend was observed by Marinho and Stuermer [14] and Rao and Revanasiddappa [15]. Their test results showed that the soil suction of a residual soil of gneiss was higher when compacted with low energy than with high compaction energy at the same molding water content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These two clayey soils both have clay fractions of 50%. However, Marinho and Stuermer [14], Rao and Revanasiddappa [15] and Tripathy et al [16] presented reversed test results for residual soils having clay fraction of 45%, 32%, 22%, and 11%. Hence, from the study in the literature the effect of compaction energy on the soil suction for different clayey soils also reverses when clay fraction approaches 50%.…”
Section: Relationship Between As-compacted Soil Suction and Soil Propmentioning
confidence: 95%