2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of the support nature on the kinetics parameters, inhibition constants and reactivation of immobilized acetylcholinesterase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nitrile groups of the PAN‐based membranes were modified to form amino groups. Then, aldehyde derivatives were introduced to the membranes through the reaction with glutaraldehyde . The produced aldehyde groups could react specifically with the alpha‐amino residues of enzymes, which meant that the enzymes were covalently bonded to the PAN ultrafiltration membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitrile groups of the PAN‐based membranes were modified to form amino groups. Then, aldehyde derivatives were introduced to the membranes through the reaction with glutaraldehyde . The produced aldehyde groups could react specifically with the alpha‐amino residues of enzymes, which meant that the enzymes were covalently bonded to the PAN ultrafiltration membranes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K M value seems to be strongly affected by immobilization process as was also reported by Gabrovska et al where K M value of immobilized AChE was approximately 3 mM compare to 0.9 mM of free AChE [31] or it could be influenced by external processes like irradiation as was described by Barteri et al who calculated K M value to 1.37 mM [32]. A high value of K M was also provided by human mutant AChE [33,34].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A higher K M value means lower affinity between the enzyme and substrate, which could be due to the introduction of steric hindrance created by the support towards the active site, as well as by the lack of sufficient enzyme flexibility for binding of the natural ligands during catalysis. 27,29,32 Additionally, the V MAX values evaluated for HuGAPDH-IMER are approximately 6-fold higher than those exhibited for the free enzyme (Table 1). Although it is difficult to estimate the extent of the derivatization with glutaraldehyde onto the capillary, the increase in the V MAX values might be attributed to the presence of a large number of potential reaction sites for covalent coupling with the protein, thereby increasing the amount of active enzyme immobilized onto the capillary.…”
Section: Kinetics Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%