2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The linear relationship between the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 score and mortality in an Asian population of community-dwelling older persons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0
11

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
4
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Follow-up of participants showed that EVA-13 significantly predicts the risk of mortality and/or institutionalization. These findings obtained in selected older individuals are consistent with those obtained by the original scale in population based samples and in ambulatory older patients included in the ACOVE study and in other cohort studies [17,19,24,25]. In this study design, participants were selected from three different healthcare related settings which resulted in including a larger proportion of vulnerable elders than Table 2 Comparison of characteristics and EVA-13 values between participants recruited from a prevention center (group 1), from a geriatric ambulatory clinic (group 2 and from a geriatric rehabilitation hospital unit (group 3) Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Follow-up of participants showed that EVA-13 significantly predicts the risk of mortality and/or institutionalization. These findings obtained in selected older individuals are consistent with those obtained by the original scale in population based samples and in ambulatory older patients included in the ACOVE study and in other cohort studies [17,19,24,25]. In this study design, participants were selected from three different healthcare related settings which resulted in including a larger proportion of vulnerable elders than Table 2 Comparison of characteristics and EVA-13 values between participants recruited from a prevention center (group 1), from a geriatric ambulatory clinic (group 2 and from a geriatric rehabilitation hospital unit (group 3) Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Another important point in this study is to emphasize the use of VES-13 as a continuous variable, and not as a categorical variable, as previously used (≥ 3 as vulnerable; < 3 as non-vulnerable). In three studies (including this one), mortality risk increased with each 1-point increment in the VES-13 score, corroborating the use of this score as a continuous variable (8,28) . In addition, scores ≥ 2 on the VES-13 also detected poor quality of life in older adults in PHC (5) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Uma proposta de avaliação da vulnerabilidade foi sugerida pelo autor (10) , por Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20) , o Índice de Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (21) e o VMSscreening (22) . (17,18) ; Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (13,14,16,21) ; AD8 Dementia Screen (19) ;…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) (18) ; e Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) (17,18) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation