1998
DOI: 10.1080/0968465980060104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mentoring dilemma: guidance and/or direction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many types of relationship which might be compared to mentoring were based in important practices in certain cultures and historical eras, such as that of religious master-disciple, or trade craftsman-apprentice (Gay & Stephenson, 1998). Representations of mentoring itself, however, became chiefly characterised as a quasi-parental relationship between exceptional individuals, such as Socrates and Plato, or Haydn and Beethoven, and contain an element of emotional bonding that is entirely absent from the highly impersonal relationship portrayed in the Odyssey:…”
Section: (2) …Then the 'Classical' Stage…mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many types of relationship which might be compared to mentoring were based in important practices in certain cultures and historical eras, such as that of religious master-disciple, or trade craftsman-apprentice (Gay & Stephenson, 1998). Representations of mentoring itself, however, became chiefly characterised as a quasi-parental relationship between exceptional individuals, such as Socrates and Plato, or Haydn and Beethoven, and contain an element of emotional bonding that is entirely absent from the highly impersonal relationship portrayed in the Odyssey:…”
Section: (2) …Then the 'Classical' Stage…mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullough, 2005). Some studies have also reported that mentoring is more likely to direct to constructive outcomes where mentors obtain reward and/or some other form of enticement or acknowledgement for their work (Abell et al,1995;Evans & Abbott, 1997;Simpson et al,2007); where it takes place in environments which are comparatively free from extreme emphases on externally resolute aims and agendas such as narrow criteria for teaching practices (Edwards, 1998;Gay & Stephenson, 1998;Yusko & Feiman Nemser, 2008); where mentors are involved in the plan and assessment of and are devoted to, the broader (ITP, orientation or early professional development) programs of which mentoring is a part (Evans & Abbott, 1997); and where such programs are coherent and not characterized by 'fragmentation' (Goodlad, 1990) between various (e.g. school-based and university-based) contributors (Hascher, et al, 2008).…”
Section: Contextual Support For Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ehhez kapcsolódóan, harmadik faktorként azonosítottam a szimpátia és a bizalmi légkör kialakításának képességét, amely együttesen a 'Bizalom megteremtésének képessége' faktornevet kapta. A faktor tartalma egybeesik Garringer (2015) modelljével, aki szerint egy tartós és hatékony mentorálási kapcsolat kialakítása során a mentor és a mentee illeszkedésének biztosítására van szükség, amely nem más, mint a bizalom megteremtése és a kölcsönös szimpátián alapuló, úgynevezett matching megléte. Azonban magában a matching, vagy más néven illeszkedés fogalmának kérdéskörében sem egységes a szakirodalom, hiszem a demográfiai és iparági tapasztalatokon túlmutatóan az attitűdalapú megközelítés biztosítását is fontosnak találják ).…”
Section: A 'Bizalom Megteremtésének Képessége' Faktorunclassified