2014
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20148102008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Muon Scattering Experiment (MUSE) at PSI and the proton radius puzzle

Abstract: Abstract. The unexplained large discrepancy of the proton charge radius measurements with muonic hydrogen Lamb shift and determinations from elastic electron scattering and Lamb shift in regular hydrogen of seven standard deviations is known as the proton radius puzzle. Suggested solutions of the puzzle range from possible errors in the experiments through unexpectedly large hadronic physics effects to new physics beyond the Standard Model. A new approach to verify the radius discrepancy in a systematic manner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the possible explanations is that the error bars, both of hydrogen spectroscopy and scattering experiments [9] were underestimated. New scattering experiments are in preparation or underway, including electron-proton [10], electron-deuteron [11] and muon-proton scattering [12]. In atomic hydrogen, the 1S-3S(D) [13,14], 2S-2P [15], and 2S-4P [16] transitions are under study in order to cross-check and improve previous results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the possible explanations is that the error bars, both of hydrogen spectroscopy and scattering experiments [9] were underestimated. New scattering experiments are in preparation or underway, including electron-proton [10], electron-deuteron [11] and muon-proton scattering [12]. In atomic hydrogen, the 1S-3S(D) [13,14], 2S-2P [15], and 2S-4P [16] transitions are under study in order to cross-check and improve previous results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, let us consider the introduction of the extraordinary claim on the existence of the n(o)-flux in the structure of the electromagnetic field of the elementary particles. As said Carl Sagan, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which perhaps will be discovered between 2018 and 2019, when the proton radius will be measured in the PSI proton accelerator (Kohl, 2014). Guglinski (2018) has calculated that proton radius, to be measured in the experiments, must be found between 0,62fm and 0,72fm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the exact cause of this time-varying efficiency was not definitively identified, but seemed to be associated with the readout system of the GEMs and its behavior as a function of hit rate/beam conditions. This should be diligently kept in mind when considering the use of the OLYMPUS GEMs in future experiments [133,134].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Exclusion Of The Gem Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six planes and two detector technologies were utilized to provide high resolution tracking of the high momentum forward events, and to provide a mechanism of cross-checks and calibration within the detector system. Ultimately, the GEM detectors were not used in the final luminosity analysis due to problems with the stability of their efficiencies (see Section 5.2.2), but were useful in the calibration of the system and are being considered for use in future experiments [133,134].…”
Section: • Tracking Telescope Luminosity Monitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%