2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01100.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preservation of fossil biomarkers during meteorite impact events: Experimental evidence from biomarker‐rich projectiles and target rocks

Abstract: Abstract-A Devonian siltstone from Orkney, Scotland, shows survival of biomarkers in high-velocity impact experiments. The biomarkers were detected in ejecta fragments from experiments involving normal incidence of steel projectiles at 5-6 km s )1 , and in projectile fragments from impact experiments into sand and water at 2-5 km s )1 . The associated peak shock pressures were calculated to be in the range of 110-147 GPa for impacts of the steel projectiles into the siltstone target, and hydrocode simulations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(146 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, when targets were doped, pre-shot with anthracene, and then impacted by inert projectiles, anthracene was only observed in ejecta at intermediate and high angles and not at shallow angles (see Bowden et al, 2009). There is also evidence from recovery impact experiments (where fragments of the projectile are recovered from the target after an impact) that thermal processing occurs during impacts and can change the organic content of projectile fragments recovered after impact experiments at speeds of 1-5 km s -1 (e.g., see Bowden et al, 2008, andParnell et al, 2010).…”
Section: Observations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, when targets were doped, pre-shot with anthracene, and then impacted by inert projectiles, anthracene was only observed in ejecta at intermediate and high angles and not at shallow angles (see Bowden et al, 2009). There is also evidence from recovery impact experiments (where fragments of the projectile are recovered from the target after an impact) that thermal processing occurs during impacts and can change the organic content of projectile fragments recovered after impact experiments at speeds of 1-5 km s -1 (e.g., see Bowden et al, 2008, andParnell et al, 2010).…”
Section: Observations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such it estimates the peak shock pressure near the projectile:target plane. In the interior of the projectile, the peak pressure will vary with location, typically falling to half the peak value in the median plane of the impactor and having a mean value approximately ¼ of the peak value in the trailing (rear) half of the impactor (see Parnell et al, 2010, for a discussion). Given the unusual nature of the projectile contents (a mixture of organic molecules), we approximated this as water ice in the calculations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some exceptions to this, such as work by Hernandez et al (2006), Kenkmann et al (2013) and Ebert et al (2014) which investigated the processes that occur between the target and projectile during hypervelocity impacts. Or, for example, by Bowden et al (2008) and Parnell et al (2010) who looked for survival of biomarkers in projectile fragments which survived impacts, and Burchell et al (2014a) who looked for transfer of volatiles to targets after impacts. Indeed, survival of diatom fossils has been shown in projectile fragments in laboratory experiments (Burchell et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for preservation of the earliest biotic and prebiotic material in terrestrial or martian meteorites is a key motivation for exploration of the Moon (Crawford et al, 2008;Burchell et al, 2014b). Recent experimental work has shown the ability of organic biomarkers to survive the impact shock conditions that would have ejected this material from the planetary surface (e.g., Parnell et al, 2010;Burchell et al, 2014a). The total amount of terrestrial material at the lunar surface today has been estimated as 1-2 ppm; however, the distribution of impacts will be non-uniform, and some areas of the surface may have received several times more or less than this amount (Armstrong, 2010).…”
Section: Sources Of Organic Matter To the Moonmentioning
confidence: 99%