1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01907963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The probability of parentage exclusion based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past decade, variation in the DNA sequence, mostly in the satellite region, has been exploited to carry out genome individualization (Jeffreys et al 1985;Epplen 1988), which, in turn, has proved to be useful for establishing individuality in forensic (Gill and Werrett 1987;Helminen et al 1988;Kasai et al 1990) and immigration cases (Jeffreys et al 1985;Jeffreys et al 1986), for resolving paternity disputes (Ito et al 1985), and for the analysis of pedigree and genetic disorders. Highly polymorphic markers, such as short tandem repeats (STRs) or microsatellites, have further proved to be useful for this purpose, as they are distributed at many loci and are amenable to automation (Budowle and Moretti 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, variation in the DNA sequence, mostly in the satellite region, has been exploited to carry out genome individualization (Jeffreys et al 1985;Epplen 1988), which, in turn, has proved to be useful for establishing individuality in forensic (Gill and Werrett 1987;Helminen et al 1988;Kasai et al 1990) and immigration cases (Jeffreys et al 1985;Jeffreys et al 1986), for resolving paternity disputes (Ito et al 1985), and for the analysis of pedigree and genetic disorders. Highly polymorphic markers, such as short tandem repeats (STRs) or microsatellites, have further proved to be useful for this purpose, as they are distributed at many loci and are amenable to automation (Budowle and Moretti 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymorphic information content (PIC) was calculated according to formula of Botstein, White, Skolnick and Davis (1980). The probability of parentage exclusion for each polymorphic locus studied here was calculated by the method of Ito, Yasuda and Matsumoto (1985). Discrimination power and matching probabilities for each locus were determined according to Fisher (1951).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The paternity exclusion was calculated using the formula described for RFLP by Ito et al (1985). The paternity index was calculated according to Garber and Morris (1983).…”
Section: Lc-i Lc-2 Ic-i Ic-2 Ic-3 Ic-4mentioning
confidence: 99%