2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-013-9097-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between preschool children’s false-belief understanding and domain-general experimentation skills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly, inductive reasoning is taught in scientific inquiry teaching; deductive reasoning seems to be more often neglected. Despite accumulating research indicating that even young children can reason scientifically (Sandoval, Sodian, Koerber and Wong 2014;Sodian, Zaitchick and Carey 1991;Piekny, Grube and Maehler 2013), in accordance with Barrouillet et al (2008) our findings indicate that third-graders commonly fail on rather simple tasks requiring hypothesis-based reasoning. This was particularly the case on tasks involving irrelevant events, before they had received the related instruction.…”
Section: Implications For Science Educationcontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Commonly, inductive reasoning is taught in scientific inquiry teaching; deductive reasoning seems to be more often neglected. Despite accumulating research indicating that even young children can reason scientifically (Sandoval, Sodian, Koerber and Wong 2014;Sodian, Zaitchick and Carey 1991;Piekny, Grube and Maehler 2013), in accordance with Barrouillet et al (2008) our findings indicate that third-graders commonly fail on rather simple tasks requiring hypothesis-based reasoning. This was particularly the case on tasks involving irrelevant events, before they had received the related instruction.…”
Section: Implications For Science Educationcontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Research on scientific reasoning has shown that although some individuals succeed in identifying controlled experiments and conclusive tests already in earlier childhood, many children still struggle with various aspects of scientific reasoning throughout childhood (e.g., Sandoval, Sodian, Koerber and Wong 2014; Sodian, Zaitchick and Carey 1991;Piekny, Grube and Maehler 2013). As one source for individual differences in scientific reasoning between children, it has been pointed out that they often struggle with differentiating between their own theories and empirical evidence, and with coordinating these two aspects in the course of inquiry (Koerber et al, 2015).…”
Section: Accommodating Heterogeneity: the Interaction Of Instructional Scaffolding With Student Preconditions In The Learning Of Hypothesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, taking together the effects on numeracy and teacher judged mathematical abilities it appears that theory of mind is still important for certain aspects of mathematics or mathematical thinking even if we take into account that teachers judgments might have been influenced by their overall perception of children's behavior. Our data in combination with studies on scientific reasoning (Astington, Pelletier, & Homer, 2002) or experimentation skills (Piekny, Grube & Maehler, 2013) suggest that theory-of-mind understanding might be especially important when the task is to reason or think about scientific and mathematical problems, in particular when the tasks are presented verbally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Sobel et al concluded that despite the children's inability to explicitly reason about probabilities, they can use probabilistic information to infer causal relationships. By the age of 5 and 6, they can successfully infer causal relationships between variables in the lack of evidence (Piekny, Grube, & Maehler, 2013) in areas such as folk physics (Baillargeon, Kotovsky, & Needham, 1995).…”
Section: Angry Birds and Science Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%