1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1990.tb00278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship of spring and summer weather with density and breeding performance of the Buzzard Buteo buteo, Goshawk Accipiter gentilis and Kestrel Falco tinnunculus

Abstract: The density of territorial pairs, laying pairs and the breeding performance of three raptor species, Buzzard Buteo buteo, Goshawk Accipiter gentilis and Kestrel Falco tinnunculus, were investigated in relation to rainfall and temperature during the breeding cycle. In all species the density of territorial pairs was not related to spring rainfall and temperature. In the Buzzard the percentage of pairs that bred unsuccessfully was significantly related to May rainfall. The number of young fledged was negatively … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our model species, three different environmental factors, belonging to climate, habitat structure and land-use cover, were involved in determining habitat quality via an effect on both the number of fledged juveniles and the probability of breeding success rather than failure: the amount of rainfall during chick rearing, the wetland interspersion index and the cover of urbanized areas. Climatic factors are important determinants of reproductive success in a large number of animal species, and studies suggest that many raptor species suffer heavy rain during brood rearing (e.g., Mearns and Newton 1988;Kostrzewa and Kostrzewa 1990;Penteriani 1997;Selås 2001;Rodrí-guez and Bustamante 2003;Krüger 2004), likely because rain (1) increases the risk of hypothermia for young, and (2) degrades the hunting conditions of adults (Lehikoinen et al 2009). Therefore, the effect of rainfall on owl breeding performance is perhaps not surprising, but our study is the first one to analyze in detail rainfall effects on owl productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our model species, three different environmental factors, belonging to climate, habitat structure and land-use cover, were involved in determining habitat quality via an effect on both the number of fledged juveniles and the probability of breeding success rather than failure: the amount of rainfall during chick rearing, the wetland interspersion index and the cover of urbanized areas. Climatic factors are important determinants of reproductive success in a large number of animal species, and studies suggest that many raptor species suffer heavy rain during brood rearing (e.g., Mearns and Newton 1988;Kostrzewa and Kostrzewa 1990;Penteriani 1997;Selås 2001;Rodrí-guez and Bustamante 2003;Krüger 2004), likely because rain (1) increases the risk of hypothermia for young, and (2) degrades the hunting conditions of adults (Lehikoinen et al 2009). Therefore, the effect of rainfall on owl breeding performance is perhaps not surprising, but our study is the first one to analyze in detail rainfall effects on owl productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th is is a reasonable result if migration distance (rather than wintering location) is genetically determined: a probable expectation especially in short-lived species (Pulido 2007). However, for some species, no shift in the wintering grounds has resulted in longer (or shorter) migration distances due years (Kostrzewa and Kostrzewa 1990, Huey 1991, Newton 1998. Furthermore, species often show higher fi delity to breeding than to wintering sites, which may also explain why, for some species, shifts were larger in the wintering than in the breeding grounds (Louchart 2008).…”
Section: Ev-7mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…obs.). In several European populations annual breeding density and productivity are greatly influenced by food resource availability and variations in the weather (Spidsø & Selås 1988, Kostrzewa & Kostrzewa 1990, Graham et al . 1995, Goszczyński 1997, Selås 2001, Lõhmus 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%