1998
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-998-0051-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain postlaminectomy

Abstract: S pinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become a common and effective method of treating chronic pain, including postlaminectomy pain. However, the indications for SCS and long-term efficacy have been debated. This article discusses our experience using SCS including indications for stimulation, surgical technique, prognostic factors related to long-term success, and the results of those patients who failed trial stimulation. We compare our experience with that of other published reports and provide a section on ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the present finding that patient indication, study duration, and study setting were prognostic factors has also been shown in previous analyses undertaken at the individual case study level. 5,10,21 Implications for Further Research The present systematic review demonstrates the urgent need for additional controlled studies of SCS in patients with CBLP and FBSS as well as further investigation into those prognostic factors (both patient-and devicerelated) that might best predict the outcome of patients receiving SCS.…”
Section: Metaepidemiologymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the present finding that patient indication, study duration, and study setting were prognostic factors has also been shown in previous analyses undertaken at the individual case study level. 5,10,21 Implications for Further Research The present systematic review demonstrates the urgent need for additional controlled studies of SCS in patients with CBLP and FBSS as well as further investigation into those prognostic factors (both patient-and devicerelated) that might best predict the outcome of patients receiving SCS.…”
Section: Metaepidemiologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…8 A number of patient-(e.g., age and sex) and device-related (e.g., number of electrodes) prognostic factors have been identified as being associated with the SCS outcomes of patients with CLBP and FBSS. 5,9,10 However, the lack of standardization in prognostic factors assessed, the qualitative nature of many of the analyses, and the relatively small size of studies on which these findings are based makes interpretation difficult. A rigorous statistical exploration of prognostic factors across case studies of SCS in CLBP/FBSS is therefore needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar ve Toht'un da BBCS tanısı ile SKS uygulanan 182 hastalık vaka serisi mevcuttur. [8] Çalışmada BBCS nedeniyle SKS yapılan 182 hastada SKS etkinliğini değerlendirmişlerdir. Deneme sürecinde 182 hastanın 165'inde ağrı şiddetinde tatmin edici azalma görül-müş ve kalıcı sisteme geçilmiş, hastaların 8.8±4.5 yıl boyunca takiplerinde182 hastanın %48'inde ağrı şid-detinde %50 ve daha fazla azalma tespit edilmiştir.…”
Section: Teknikunclassified
“…Therefore, there have been many studies which have reported the use of SCS for FBSS. However, according to Kumar and Toth [6], the long-term effect of SCS varies among studies, ranging from 40% to 70%. This suggests the longterm effect of SCS is unstable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed that patients with long intervals between the first visit to the pain clinic and SCS implantation have a tendency of poor long-term outcome with SCS. Kumar et al [6] reported that one of the prognostic factors was the interval between the first surgery and SCS implantation. The longer duration of pain affects long-term outcome of SCS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%