2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of transpapillary drainage in management of patients with pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption as a consequences of severe acute pancreatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However the majority (90.48%) of patients suffered from partial disruption of the MPD, which enabled stenting of the disruption using pancreatic endoprosthesis and, consequently, led to better results of endoscopic treatment. Partial disruption of the MPD is associated with better outcomes of endotherapy compared to complete disruption of the MPD ( Devière et al., 1995 ; Varadarajulu et al., 2005 ; Jagielski et al., 2017 ; Jagielski et al, 2018a ; Jagielski and Jackowski, 2021a ). Although endotherapy is a more effective treatment method in cases of partial disruption of the pancreatic duct compared with total disruption in patients with pancreatitis, we believe that stenting of the MPD should also be applied in patients with complete duct disruption ( Jagielski et al., 2018b ; Jagielski et al., 2021a ; Jagielski et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However the majority (90.48%) of patients suffered from partial disruption of the MPD, which enabled stenting of the disruption using pancreatic endoprosthesis and, consequently, led to better results of endoscopic treatment. Partial disruption of the MPD is associated with better outcomes of endotherapy compared to complete disruption of the MPD ( Devière et al., 1995 ; Varadarajulu et al., 2005 ; Jagielski et al., 2017 ; Jagielski et al, 2018a ; Jagielski and Jackowski, 2021a ). Although endotherapy is a more effective treatment method in cases of partial disruption of the pancreatic duct compared with total disruption in patients with pancreatitis, we believe that stenting of the MPD should also be applied in patients with complete duct disruption ( Jagielski et al., 2018b ; Jagielski et al., 2021a ; Jagielski et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the etiology, disruption of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) or smaller pancreatic ducts, defined as a break in the continuity of the duct leading to leakage of pancreatic juice, is at the root of the development of PF (Larsen and Kozarek, 2014;Jagielski et al, 2018a;Jagielski et al, 2018b). Disruption of MPD occurs in over 80% patients with post-inflammatory pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections (PPFCs) during the course of acute or chronic pancreatitis (Tay and Chang, 2013;Jagielski et al, 2017;Jagielski et al, 2020;Jagielski and Jackowski, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of infection was presumed based on clinical signs (such as deterioration of general condition or fever) or the presence of extraluminal gas in the pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. PNF samples were obtained during the first step of endoscopic treatment of symptomatic WOPN as described previously [12][13][14]. Infection of WOPN was confirmed by culture of PNF obtained from image-guided fine-needle aspiration in 14 patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%