2003
DOI: 10.1080/1025389031000104670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Syracuse Strains, Selectively Bred for Differences in Active Avoidance Learning, may be Models of Genetic Differences in Trait and State Anxiety

Abstract: The derivation of the Syracuse high- and low-avoidance strains is described. The behavioral characterization of the high- and low-avoidance phenotypes is summarized and it is concluded that the SLA/Bru strain is best described as having higher state and trait anxiety than their SHA/Bru counterparts. Although the behavioral covariates of the high- and low avoidance phenotypes are consistent, the covariation of the endocrine system normally thought to be involved in stress, is anomalous. The SLA/Bru rats, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among strains of rats exhibiting abnormally high degree of avoidance learning and expression, the WKY rat is unusual. Typically, rats selectively bred for rapid avoidance acquisition are less emotional and less stress reactive (Brush, 2003 ; Steimer and Driscoll, 2003 ). Further, rats selectively bred for emotionality exhibit an inverse relationship between emotionality and avoidance performance (Powell and North-Jones, 1974 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among strains of rats exhibiting abnormally high degree of avoidance learning and expression, the WKY rat is unusual. Typically, rats selectively bred for rapid avoidance acquisition are less emotional and less stress reactive (Brush, 2003 ; Steimer and Driscoll, 2003 ). Further, rats selectively bred for emotionality exhibit an inverse relationship between emotionality and avoidance performance (Powell and North-Jones, 1974 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%