1992
DOI: 10.1016/0960-1686(92)90287-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The thermodynamics of pollutant removal as an indicator of possible source areas for arctic haze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using the same host chemical transport model (TOMCAT) have not revealed any major global discrepancy in wet deposition [Giannakopoulos et al, 1999;Rasch et al, 2000], but the Arctic appears to present a particularly severe test of the model wet removal scheme because it is remote from strong aerosol sources so aerosol abundance becomes dominated by removal processes. Bowling and Shaw [1992] discussed the difficulty of reconciling basic thermodynamic changes in air transported to the Arctic with the survival of air pollutants. They showed that the observed temperature and humidity of polluted Arctic air could only be explained if precipitation occurred during transport or if pollutants were injected high into dry layers at source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using the same host chemical transport model (TOMCAT) have not revealed any major global discrepancy in wet deposition [Giannakopoulos et al, 1999;Rasch et al, 2000], but the Arctic appears to present a particularly severe test of the model wet removal scheme because it is remote from strong aerosol sources so aerosol abundance becomes dominated by removal processes. Bowling and Shaw [1992] discussed the difficulty of reconciling basic thermodynamic changes in air transported to the Arctic with the survival of air pollutants. They showed that the observed temperature and humidity of polluted Arctic air could only be explained if precipitation occurred during transport or if pollutants were injected high into dry layers at source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During transport from the source regions to the Arctic, the pollutant‐containing air masses have a high probability of reaching saturation and nucleating and precipitating clouds. It is not understood how so much material gets through a strongly scavenging system (Bowling and Shaw, 1992).…”
Section: The Arctic Haze Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of Pb isotope composition defined by our high‐Pb points and by most of the data of Rosman et al [1993, 1994] is instead very similar to the mean composition of 1990 Arctic haze aerosols sampled in Barrow, Alaska [ Sturges et al , 1993] (Figure 5) and to aerosols collected in 1983–1984 for two Canadian high Arctic stations ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb only [ Sturges and Barrie , 1989]). Chemical evidence [ Lowenthal and Rahn , 1985; Maenhaut et al , 1989; Nriagu , 1989a; Rahn , 1985] and meteorological investigations [ Bowling and Shaw , 1992; Iversen and Joranger , 1985; Raatz , 1991] point to the former Soviet Union as the dominant contributor to low‐altitude pollution in the Arctic vortex, with a lesser fraction from western European sources and negligible Canadian and U.S. contributions. For Pb in particular, a chemical transport model for 1979–1980 concluded that Pb flux to the Arctic during that year was split roughly equally between western European, eastern European, and former Soviet emissions sources (North American sources were not considered [ Akeredolu et al , 1994]).…”
Section: Sources Of Trace Metals In Central Greenlandmentioning
confidence: 99%