2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thermoelastic anisotropy in NdScO3 and NdGaO3 perovskites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this number can be further reduced when the crystalline symmetry of the solid material is taken into account. Rareearth scandates with orthorhombic symmetry have nine independent elastic coefficients that can be computed, such as C [19][20][21]. In our calculation and experimental data [20,21], the relationship between the lattice constants is c < a < b (standard setting), whereas in the experimental and theoretical study [19], a < b < c (non-standard setting) [2].…”
Section: Elastic Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this number can be further reduced when the crystalline symmetry of the solid material is taken into account. Rareearth scandates with orthorhombic symmetry have nine independent elastic coefficients that can be computed, such as C [19][20][21]. In our calculation and experimental data [20,21], the relationship between the lattice constants is c < a < b (standard setting), whereas in the experimental and theoretical study [19], a < b < c (non-standard setting) [2].…”
Section: Elastic Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Rareearth scandates with orthorhombic symmetry have nine independent elastic coefficients that can be computed, such as C [19][20][21]. In our calculation and experimental data [20,21], the relationship between the lattice constants is c < a < b (standard setting), whereas in the experimental and theoretical study [19], a < b < c (non-standard setting) [2]. When the elastic constants of materials with orthorhombic structure are compared with the literature, the standard or nonstandard representation between the lattice constants should be taken into account.…”
Section: Elastic Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, we assume a relatively large anisotropic misfit strain of ε xx ¼ 0:0% and ε yy ¼ 1:0% in the simulations. Also, note that the misfit strains are assumed to be constant in the investigated temperature range due to the similar thermal expansion coefficients for NdScO 3 34 and KNbO 3 . 35 In this paper, we will show that our specific selection of mismatch strains leads to a very good agreement between the simulation and the experiment.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%