2019
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

They call us fellows: the challenge of gender bias in the Australasian College of Sport and Exercise Physicians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender inequality in science is undeniable1 2 Although women increasingly study Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine (STEMM) subjects, they comprise a minority of senior academic staff, are promoted more slowly, are less often trained in elite research groups and more likely to leave STEMM careers 3–5. In Medical and Allied Health fields, the gender parity in graduates has not transferred to academic leadership: women are under-represented in publications, grant funding, leadership roles, conference keynotes and as panel members6 compared with men. Under-representation of women in leadership denies women important role models—you cannot be what you cannot see.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender inequality in science is undeniable1 2 Although women increasingly study Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine (STEMM) subjects, they comprise a minority of senior academic staff, are promoted more slowly, are less often trained in elite research groups and more likely to leave STEMM careers 3–5. In Medical and Allied Health fields, the gender parity in graduates has not transferred to academic leadership: women are under-represented in publications, grant funding, leadership roles, conference keynotes and as panel members6 compared with men. Under-representation of women in leadership denies women important role models—you cannot be what you cannot see.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Australia, fewer women than men apply to train in SEM and these numbers have plateaued. In 2019, 23% of fellows and 30% of registrars were women 2. According to the 2020 Physician Specialty Data Report, only 29.4% of sports medicine physicians in the USA3 (residents and fellows) are women and only 12.9% of sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons are women.…”
Section: Where Are We Now?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor might be the impact of gender bias on women’s careers. Former ACSEP president, Tulloh2 has written that women are ‘not chosen for the better paid, higher profile jobs supporting men’s teams, and are preferentially selected for covering lower paid, lower profile women’s teams’. She has also written about the challenges of gender bias within the ACSEP and the actions they have taken to improve gender balance.…”
Section: What Are the Barriers To A Career In Sem?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While motherhood and the inability to have work-life balance may inhibit some female sports medicine physicians from moving up to leadership positions in collegiate and other athletic settings, hopefully as more women assume leadership positions such as the head team physician, more younger women will experience mentorship and seek out these positions as well. However, challenges for women in sports medicine leadership include those common to women in general: [89] 1. The association of leadership with masculine qualities; 2.…”
Section: Optimizing Workforce To Care For Female Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While motherhood and the inability to have work–life balance may inhibit some female sports medicine physicians from moving up to leadership positions in collegiate and other athletic settings, hopefully as more women assume leadership positions such as the head team physician, more younger women will experience mentorship and seek out these positions as well. However, challenges for women in sports medicine leadership include those common to women in general: [ 89 ] The association of leadership with masculine qualities; Lack of affirmation of feminine leadership traits and the resulting lack of self-identification as a leader; Barriers in the career progression pipeline; Lack of diversity in selection panels; The “double bind” (where women are expected to demonstrate masculine traits and are then criticized for doing so); Persisting cultural norms (career vs family). …”
Section: Optimizing Workforce To Care For Female Athletesmentioning
confidence: 99%