Advances in Solid State Physics
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44946-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Electric Field Probing of Ferroelectrics on the Nanometer Scale Using Scanning Force Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the sample surface roughness and the slight variation in chemical compositions, the effective PFM tip‐sample contact area varies along the sample surface. As a result, the electric field imposed by PFM tip is inhomogeneous . In contrast, the P – E hysteresis loop gathered information from a large number of grains under the electrode area, thus the applied electric field on the sample surface would be much more uniform.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the sample surface roughness and the slight variation in chemical compositions, the effective PFM tip‐sample contact area varies along the sample surface. As a result, the electric field imposed by PFM tip is inhomogeneous . In contrast, the P – E hysteresis loop gathered information from a large number of grains under the electrode area, thus the applied electric field on the sample surface would be much more uniform.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied voltage has to be high enough in order to cause the measurable signal but it should be sufficiently small to prevent local switching and domain wall motion. Along with vertical deflection of the cantilever, a lateral motion could be detected via the friction force [4]. Since the torsional motion of the cantilever is involved, the ferroelectric must be scanned in two orthogonal directions.…”
Section: Principle Of Pfm Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small size of ferroelectric elements in MEMS, there is a growing need in microscopic techniques allowing for the evaluation of their piezoelectric properties with the nanoscale resolution. Such technique, piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM), became an interesting opportunity for the measurements of local electromechanical properties of ferroelectric films, single crystals, and even ceramics [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Along with the local measurements of piezoelectric coefficients and domain visualization, this technique allows for a direct matching of local properties to the microstructural details, since both are imaged simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principles and image formation mechanism of PFM are described in detail elsewhere. [9][10][11] PFM is implemented on a commercial scanning probe microscopy ͑SPM͒ system ͑Veeco MultiMode NS-IIIA͒ equipped with additional function generators and lock-in amplifiers ͑DS 345 and SRS 830, Stanford Research Instruments, and Model 7280, Signal Recovery͒. A custom-built sample holder was used to allow direct tip biasing and to avoid capacitive cross talk in the SPM electronics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%