2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time course of gender agreement violations containing emotional words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The motivation for introducing the ANPW_R was to provide research materials for scientists interested in the interplay between language and emotions (e.g., Citron, 2012 ; Kaltwasser et al, 2013 ; Imbir et al, 2015a ). The areas of interest for affective norms for words are not limited to emotional scientists but also extend to researchers interested in psycholinguistics, including more complex processes such as morphosyntactic processing (Martín-Loeches et al, 2012 ; Hinojosa et al, 2014 ; Díaz-Lago et al, 2015 ) or phonological processes during language production (Hinojosa et al, 2010 ; White et al, 2016 ). The main aim of the current work was to extend a recently introduced the ANPW (Imbir, 2015a ) dataset to a greater number of words, as well as to assess the properties of stimuli using new scales such as concreteness and subjective age of acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation for introducing the ANPW_R was to provide research materials for scientists interested in the interplay between language and emotions (e.g., Citron, 2012 ; Kaltwasser et al, 2013 ; Imbir et al, 2015a ). The areas of interest for affective norms for words are not limited to emotional scientists but also extend to researchers interested in psycholinguistics, including more complex processes such as morphosyntactic processing (Martín-Loeches et al, 2012 ; Hinojosa et al, 2014 ; Díaz-Lago et al, 2015 ) or phonological processes during language production (Hinojosa et al, 2010 ; White et al, 2016 ). The main aim of the current work was to extend a recently introduced the ANPW (Imbir, 2015a ) dataset to a greater number of words, as well as to assess the properties of stimuli using new scales such as concreteness and subjective age of acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these data, it has been possible to outline some conclusions regarding the interplay between emotion and language at both the word and sentence levels. In this sense, the results of several studies have revealed the involvement of lexico-sematic, phonological or morphosyntactic informationon the processing of emotional language [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. However, there are many other questions that remain less understood, such as the effects of subjective AoA in the processing of affective language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our ERP effects are difficult to explain in terms of valence in the light of prior research. As in the case of emotional words, we could expect emotional sentences to recruit more processing resources than neutral sentences, and negative sentences more than positive sentences (Carretié et al, 2008;Díaz-Lago et al, 2015;Ding et al, 2016;Herbert et al, 2006;Herbert et al 2008;Hinojosa et al, 2014;Holt et al, 2009;Kanske & Kotz, 2007;Kissler et al, 2009;Martín-Loeches et al, 2012;Moreno & Rivera, 2013;Moreno & Vázquez 2011;. As person and thing sentences did not differ in valence in the norming studies, we would expect in a passive reading task valence affecting both person and thing sentences: greater ERP amplitudes to negative in contrast to positive sentences.…”
Section: Valence and Directionmentioning
confidence: 95%