2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toward biologically meaningful net carbon exchange estimates for tall, dense canopies: Multi-level eddy covariance observations and canopy coupling regimes in a mature Douglas-fir forest in Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
115
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
115
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies in forest sites reported that the drainage flows were restricted in the subcanopy layer, which characterized with relative open canopy and insignificant understory vegetation [8,13,21], or at the upper part of a long slope [39,40], or very gentle slope [39]. We did not detect the possible subcanopy wind maximum as many previous studies [13,28,31,41,42] due to only one observation point below canopy.…”
Section: Horizontal Wind Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 46%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies in forest sites reported that the drainage flows were restricted in the subcanopy layer, which characterized with relative open canopy and insignificant understory vegetation [8,13,21], or at the upper part of a long slope [39,40], or very gentle slope [39]. We did not detect the possible subcanopy wind maximum as many previous studies [13,28,31,41,42] due to only one observation point below canopy.…”
Section: Horizontal Wind Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…For example, the height of wind velocity maximum on the low-angle (1.6°) side-wall of the floor of Utah's Salt Lake Valley occurred at 10 to 15 m height [20], but could reach 40 m in another slope in the same valley [48]. Most studies in forest sites reported that the drainage flows were restricted in the subcanopy layer, which characterized with relative open canopy and insignificant understory vegetation [8,13,21], or at the upper part of a long slope [39,40], or very gentle slope [39]. We did not detect the possible subcanopy wind maximum as many previous studies [13,28,31,41,42] due to only one observation point below canopy.…”
Section: Horizontal Wind Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations