2008
DOI: 10.1080/02697450802076613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Evolutionary and Endogenous Growth Theory Explanation of Why Regional and Urban Economies in England are Diverging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, Churski (2005), and Baláž (2007) point out a strong core-periphery pattern of regional development in CEE countries with a strengthening position of core regions. This pattern is explained by the increasing importance of agglomeration economies (Geppert, Stephan 2008), and by a spatially uneven distribution of human capital (Baláž 2007), innovations (Simmie, Carpenter 2008), and infrastructure (Baláž 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, Churski (2005), and Baláž (2007) point out a strong core-periphery pattern of regional development in CEE countries with a strengthening position of core regions. This pattern is explained by the increasing importance of agglomeration economies (Geppert, Stephan 2008), and by a spatially uneven distribution of human capital (Baláž 2007), innovations (Simmie, Carpenter 2008), and infrastructure (Baláž 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The explanation of the negative evolution shown by specific regions and/or clustersbeyond the triggering structural processesusually pays attention to what is known as endogenous blocks in the form of specific inherited structures (economic, socio-occupational, institutional, etc.) which limit their adaptation capacity, one of the manifestations of the so-called 'path dependence principle' (Martin and Sunley 2006;Simmie and Carpenter 2008), which highlights the accumulative character of decisions, the derived inertias and their influence on local evolutions which are often slowly transformed. firms belonging to the cluster increases as this convergence process continues, and the innovation potential is reduced because of the strong specialization and the concentration in a few firms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was argued that initial events could provide strong feedback mechanisms that favour initial development over potential developments that are initiated later in time (Arthur, 1989;North, 1990;Pierson, 2000). Over the years, path dependency also became popular in other disciplines like sociology (Hall & Taylor, 1996;Gorges, 2001), political science (Mahoney, 2001a(Mahoney, , 2001b and economic geography (Arthur, 1988;Simmie & Carpenter, 2008). Especially in these fields, attention has shifted from stable situations towards accounts for change (Mahoney, 2001a;Hassink, 2005;Cappoccia & Kelemen, 2007;Martin, 2010), incorporating both incremental as well as more abrupt forms of change.…”
Section: Path Dependencymentioning
confidence: 97%