2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Meaningful 3D-Printed Object: Understanding the Materiality of 3D Prints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Por fim, foi possível identificar que, se por um lado alguns artigos tiveram por objetivo o entendimento da experiência do usuário em si (BAXTER et al, 2015;HAKKILA, COLLEY, 2015;VEELAERT et al, 2019), por outro as práticas empíricas focaram na aplicação de materiais experimentais variados (PARISI et al, 2017) como, por exemplo, compósito de micélio (MONNA, 2017, compósito de arroz e sal (YIN et al, 2017), e polímeros para impressão 3D (NAM et al, 2019). Abrindo um viés de possibilidades de investigação com novas atividades práticas para a exploração de materiais não convencionais.…”
Section: Resultados E Discussõesunclassified
“…Por fim, foi possível identificar que, se por um lado alguns artigos tiveram por objetivo o entendimento da experiência do usuário em si (BAXTER et al, 2015;HAKKILA, COLLEY, 2015;VEELAERT et al, 2019), por outro as práticas empíricas focaram na aplicação de materiais experimentais variados (PARISI et al, 2017) como, por exemplo, compósito de micélio (MONNA, 2017, compósito de arroz e sal (YIN et al, 2017), e polímeros para impressão 3D (NAM et al, 2019). Abrindo um viés de possibilidades de investigação com novas atividades práticas para a exploração de materiais não convencionais.…”
Section: Resultados E Discussõesunclassified
“…3Dprinted objects are neither mass-manufactured, nor handmade. Rather, they are customizable like handmade objects but made through less intimate and perhaps production-like methods as in massmanufacturing (Nam, Berman, Garcia & Chu, 2019).…”
Section: Craft and Mass-produced Souvenirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shewbridge et al investigated what people would print at home with an imaginary "faux 3D printer", finding that many wanted to replicate or modify existing objects in their environment. However, end-users expectations of what to print are dependant on their previous exposure to real 3D printing processes [15,50]. It is important to consider that the end-product is more than just geometry, but has material qualities dependent on the printing configuration [11].…”
Section: Designing Design: Imagining and Planning What To Printmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, capturing accurate measurements for a particular specification may often be challenging without assistance or training [41]. Regardless of material, newcomers to 3D printing have been shown to value their participation in the printing process [50]. However, participation in printing processes is not trivial as design-intent is often not conveyed in 3D file formats [36], and there are often miscommunications conveying design-intent to others [15].…”
Section: Designing Design: Imagining and Planning What To Printmentioning
confidence: 99%