2015
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training match and mismatch as a driver of key employee behaviours

Abstract: Training is widely believed to have the potential to improve key workplace outcomes such as the in‐role behaviours and organisational citizenship of employees. However, this article argues that match of actual training provision to requirements leads to the greatest possible improvement in key behaviours, an assertion that lacks prior validation. Undertraining relative to requirements would typically be associated with lower behavioural gain, or even negative behaviours. Overtraining may have both positive and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the AMO framework, we propose that training is likely to develop employee capabilities and motivate employees to engage in their work to achieve higher mandatory, in-role (task) and voluntary, extra-role (organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)) performance (Organ, 1994;Williams and Anderson, 1991). Moreover, training is unlikely to be universally effective (Lee, 2015). We argue that where a strong HRM climate prevails, training is more likely to have the desired benefits on improving employee performance.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the AMO framework, we propose that training is likely to develop employee capabilities and motivate employees to engage in their work to achieve higher mandatory, in-role (task) and voluntary, extra-role (organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)) performance (Organ, 1994;Williams and Anderson, 1991). Moreover, training is unlikely to be universally effective (Lee, 2015). We argue that where a strong HRM climate prevails, training is more likely to have the desired benefits on improving employee performance.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, employees are given sufficient time and to learn and practice and the contents of training match their needs (e.g. on multiple skills, social relationship, safety) (Lee, 2015). These preconditions are important for training to have positive effects and require validation in future research.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in the previous empirical literature dealing with human resources management practices (Huselid, 1995];De Kok et al, 2006]; Lee, 2015]) and eco-innovation (Kesidou and Demirel, 2012]; Bossle et al, 2016]), we adopted regression analysis to undertake our study; in particular, to verify whether family firms who adopted an EMS within the EMAS scheme are more motivated to engage in employees' training and development programmes (H1), we performed the regression function as follows [equation ( 1)]]:…”
Section: Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, defining the important elements of training program and characteristics of trainees that matter for the resultant performance of those being trained is yet to be fully explored (Lee, 2015). This study reaffirms the impact of training on performance by focusing on the objective of identifying those elements of a training program and characteristics of a trainee which significantly impact the performance of an employee.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%