1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)80232-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition metal complexes with sulfur ligands Part LXXIX. Crown thioether complexes of iron, cobalt, nickel and copper with bzo2-18S6. X-ray structure analysis of [Ni(bzo2-18S6)][B(C6H5)4]2 (bzo2-18S6 = 2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexathiacyclooctadeca-2,11-diene)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) with Ni(II), Cd(II), Ru(II), and Cu(II) are also presented in this report. The magnetic moments for the Ni(II) complexes were in the range of 2.95-3.05 B.M., similar to previously reported values of hexakis(thioether) nickel(II) complexes and consistent with two unpaired electrons per nickel [9,51,61,62]. Magnetic susceptibility measurements on the 22S6 complexes of Fe(II) and Co(II) complexes show that both are low-spin complexes, and their absorption spectra (see below) are also consistent with low-spin systems.…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…(2) with Ni(II), Cd(II), Ru(II), and Cu(II) are also presented in this report. The magnetic moments for the Ni(II) complexes were in the range of 2.95-3.05 B.M., similar to previously reported values of hexakis(thioether) nickel(II) complexes and consistent with two unpaired electrons per nickel [9,51,61,62]. Magnetic susceptibility measurements on the 22S6 complexes of Fe(II) and Co(II) complexes show that both are low-spin complexes, and their absorption spectra (see below) are also consistent with low-spin systems.…”
Section: Measurementssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Two distinctive shoulders were seen in the LMCT region (320 to 370 nm) with an intensity (ε = 1600 M -1 cm -1 ) intermediate between that of resting FTase (one thiolate ligand, ε = 1030 M -1 cm -1 ) and that of the ternary complex (two thiolate ligands, ε = 1900 M -1 cm -1 ) . The intensity of the charge-transfer transition for the product complex would be consistent with mixed Co-thiolate + Co-thioether ligation, thus suggesting that the thioether product remains coordinated to the Co (and thus presumably to the Zn). However, other factors, including thiolate-Co geometry, can affect the observed charge-transfer intensity, thus potentially complicating interpretation of the UV−visible spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…) 1900 M -1 cm -1 ). 1 The intensity of the charge-transfer transition for the product complex would be consistent with mixed Co-thiolate + Co-thioether ligation, 44 thus suggesting that the thioether product remains coordinated to the Co (and thus presumably to the Zn). However, other factors, including thiolate-Co geometry, can affect the observed charge-transfer intensity, thus potentially complicating interpretation of the UV-visible spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Ni-S(thiolate) and Ni-S(thioether) distances lie in the expected range of 217-220 pm, 2g,26,27 and their nearly identical values can be traced back to the σ-donor-π-donor and σ-donor-π-acceptor character of the respective bonds. 28 Less common is the molecular structure…”
Section: Syntheses Andmentioning
confidence: 99%