2005
DOI: 10.1080/0141620052000276500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traversing the gap: Andrew Wright, John Hick and critical religious education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teece entreats religious believers to be ‘epistemologically humble’, by which he means that they should conclude that their own religious convictions are no better warranted than the religious convictions of others. The assumption that the different religions represent different but complementary revelations of the divine, he believes, supports learning and teaching in religious education and its inculcation in the young will contribute to a ‘fruitful’ and ‘appropriate critical education for the twentieth‐first century’ (Teece, 2005, p. 39).…”
Section: Educational Expressions Of the Essential Unity Of The Difmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Teece entreats religious believers to be ‘epistemologically humble’, by which he means that they should conclude that their own religious convictions are no better warranted than the religious convictions of others. The assumption that the different religions represent different but complementary revelations of the divine, he believes, supports learning and teaching in religious education and its inculcation in the young will contribute to a ‘fruitful’ and ‘appropriate critical education for the twentieth‐first century’ (Teece, 2005, p. 39).…”
Section: Educational Expressions Of the Essential Unity Of The Difmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Secondly that the process of homogenisation leads to the misrepresentation of religions (Revell 2012) and lastly that the first two factors mean there is no scope for pupils to be critical of religion (Barnes andWright 2006 andTeece 2010). A major concern of Barnes and Wright is that questions of truth are marginalised and Enlightenment definitions of religion are presented as neutral.…”
Section: Why Engagement Doesn't Happenmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(Wright, 1997, p. 153) Elsewhere it has been questioned whether Wright polarizes issues unnecessarily (Teece, 2005). There is no need to oppose philosophical rigor to tolerance, or linguistic capability to experiential reflection (O'Grady, 2005).…”
Section: Religious Education's Hermeneutic Turnmentioning
confidence: 97%