Treatise on International Criminal Law : Volume 1: Foundations and General Part

Ambos, Kai

doi:10.1093/law/9780199657926.001.0001

Cited by 70 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Naime, radnja izvršenja ovog krivičnog dela nije dovršena nestankom lica. Ovo krivično delo je dovršeno tek onda kada budu pružene tačne informacije o nestalom licu ili kada bude pronađeno (živo ili mrtvo) 18 što ovom krivičnom delu daje karakter trajnog krivičnog dela. 19 2.…”

Section: Opšta Razmatranjaunclassified

Enforced disappearance as crime against humanity in Rome Statute

Ševo¹

2019

Crimen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apstrakt: Rad se bavi inkriminacijom prinudnog nestanka lica kao oblikom zločina protiv čovečnosti u Rimskom statutu, izvoru prava koji prvi put precizno određuje biće ovog krivičnog dela. Rad analizira specifičnosti ovog krivičnog dela u pogledu njegove radnje izvršenja koja ima dva stadijuma, subjektivnog elementa koji je kod ovog krivičnog dela dvostruk, učešća države ili političke organizacije kao bitnom elementu bića ovog krivičnog dela ali i zajedničkih elemenata od čijeg ispunjenja zavisi i ispunjenje uslova da bi prinudni nestanak bio zločin protiv čovečnosti. Takođe, rad sadrži analizu vremenske nadležnosti Stalnog međunarodnog suda u pogledu ovog krivičnog dela zbog njegove specifičnosti i u ovom pogledu. Autorka daje prikaz elemenata bića ovog krivičnog dela, nastojeći da ukaže na eventualne probleme koji se mogu pojaviti u praksi kod ovog krivičnog dela, ali i potencijalno preširoka tumačenja na koja možemo naići u literaturi. Ključne reči: prinudni nestanak lica, zločin protiv čovečnosti, Rimski statut. * Asistent, olivera.sevo@pf.unibl.org 1 Zakon o potvrđivanju Rimskog statuta Međunarodnog krivičnog suda, "Službeni list SRJ -Međunarodni ugovori", br. 5/2001, čl.7, st.1, tač. f.

show abstract

Section: Opšta Razmatranjaunclassified

Enforced disappearance as crime against humanity in Rome Statute

Ševo¹

2019

Crimen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In contrast to the traditional common law approach, these jurisdictions do not treat consciousness of the legal wrong (merely) in the context of mens rea 71 but as a prerequisite for the actor's personal blameworthiness. 72 In this regard, the most significant example might be that of Italy. Article 5 of the Italian Criminal Code stipulates that 'no one can rely on his ignorance of the law in order to be excused' .…”

Section: A Brief Comparative Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…92 This was even recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court which held that the 'proliferation of statutes and regulations has sometimes made it difficult for the average citizen to know and comprehend the extent of the duties and obligations imposed' on him. 93 If the presumption of knowledge of the law is, however, 'a fiction bordering on the absurd' 94 and an absolute duty to know the law is impossible to fulfil, then the error iuris rule loses its legitimacy. 95 It would be unfair to convict a person who -for understandable reasons -was unaware that he was committing a wrong and thus cannot be blamed for his ignorance.…”

Section: Considerations Of Fairness and Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

The Prerequisite of Personal Guilt and the Duty to Know the Law in the Light of Article 32 ICC Statute

Bock

2013

ULR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Until the Šljivancanin case, in which the right of armed conflicts was invoked139 . The lowest common denominator of this jurisprudence is precisely to be directed towards finding a source of the obligation to act, even found in national rights, instead identifying in the laws and customs of war an alternative source140 . The same casuistry on the configuration of the duty to act is rather rich but above all the duty to act incardinated on the responsibility of position stands out: think of the caseMucić 141 and the case of Bala, Musliu, Murtezi 142 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

[Artigo retratado] Criminal liability and compulsory in international criminal justice

Liakopoulos

2019

Rev. de Dir. da Fac. Guanambi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aims to explore the relationship of criminal liability and compulsory in international criminal justice according the founding of international individual criminal responsibility in relation on the Transnational Corporations. There are few cases in which an International Criminal Court has used previous international jurisprudence to establish a crime of conduct in international customary law, and in any case the importance of international judgments can not be underestimated as a general interpretative tool. The offer of incriminating solution that serves as an extrema ratio for the criminal penalties that are imputable to multinational companies and which completes the sanctioning apparatus of international law is one of the solution offered and the result of a reconstruction that started mainly from the examples of national laws, but it should not be overlooked, that the penal responsibility of the multinational companies was expressly foreseen and regulated in the draft of the Statute of the International Criminal Court.

show abstract

Treatise on International Criminal Law : Volume 1: Foundations and General Part

Cited by 70 publications

References 0 publications

Enforced disappearance as crime against humanity in Rome Statute

Enforced disappearance as crime against humanity in Rome Statute

The Prerequisite of Personal Guilt and the Duty to Know the Law in the Light of Article 32 ICC Statute

[Artigo retratado] Criminal liability and compulsory in international criminal justice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About