Treatment of a Chromate‐Contaminated Soil Site by in situ Gaseous Reduction

Abstract

A proof‐of‐concept field test for the treatment of hexavalent chromium in the vadose zone using in situ gaseous reduction was successfully completed by the U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Defense in a joint demonstration conducted at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. The test involved injecting hydrogen sulfide, diluted in air, into contaminated vadose zone sediment to reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III). The gaseous mixture was injected directly into the contaminated sediment through a central injection well and vacuum extracted through the flow field with six boreholes at the site periphery over a 76‐d period. Comparison of soil samples taken before and after the test indicated 70% of the total mass of hexavalent chromium originally present at the site was reduced and immobilized. The zone of highest contamination was nearly completely treated, with average Cr(VI) concentrations decreasing in this interval from an average of 8.1 mg/kg before treatment to 1.1 mg/kg after treatment. Treatment was best in higher permeability clean gypsum sands and less effective in zones containing greater amounts of silt and clay and a slightly higher iron content. All hexavalent chromium concentrations measured in the posttest samples, however, were well below the remedial goal and regulatory limit of 30 mg/kg. In addition, the field test demonstrated that vadose zone treatment of contamination can be safely conducted using diluted hydrogen sulfide gas mixtures. Ongoing development of the technology is being directed toward addressing the limitations of gaseous treatment arising from variations in sediment permeability and iron content and assessing the relationship between hydrogen sulfide consumption and reaction kinetics.

A comprehensive overview of elements in bioremediation

“…In addition, the field test demonstrated that vadose zone treatment of contamination could be safely conducted using diluted hydrogen sulphide gas mixtures Thornton et al (2007) Naphthalene at a creosotecontaminated…”

Influence of Soil Geochemical and Physical Properties on Chromium(VI) Sorption and Bioaccessibility

“…2003 a ). Most of these facilities have soil Cr(VI) concentrations that exceed the regulatory limit of 30–240 mg Cr(VI)/kg of soil, with regulatory limits being State dependent. , Since the soils are exposed to the environment, precipitation events have the propensity to drive Cr(VI) through the soil profile into groundwater. The Cr(VI) moiety is generally considered to have limited retardation within the soil profile, and the potential for Cr(VI) transport to groundwater has been taken very seriously.…”

What do we know about the influence of vacuum on bacterial biocenosis used in environmental biotechnologies?

“…The introduction of vacuum into microbial fuel cells caused only slight changes in the community structure, but the metabolic activity changed significantly. The attachment between extracellular polymeric substances and one of the electrodes was much stronger, resulting in the generation of power that was seven times higher as compared with the atmospheric environment (Xiao et al 2013). Unfortunately, there is only one such report.…”