2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/798/1/012147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UCN source with superfluid helium at WWR-M reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that at the ESS for a sD 2 UCN source a heat load of at least several kW at 5 K can be expected, taking into account that the heat load on the FRM II UCN source is ∼500 W. A cooling power of several kW at 5 K is technically feasible, but already requires cooling machines at the commercially available upper power limit. Concerning the fact, that for a He-II source temperatures below 1 K are desired, thus requiring even more high-power cooling techniques, a sD 2 source for the inpile case seems to be more realistic and easier achievable, although Serebrov et al have demonstrated at the WWR-M reactor at PNPI that, with an efficient thermal shielding and powerful cooling techniques, it is possible to remove 60 W of heat from a He-II converter at a temperature of 1.37 K [55]. An effective sD 2 converter thickness of a few cm would be sufficient, if the UCN source is placed at a position where a strong cold neutron flux from the lower liquid D 2 moderator hits the deuterium converter.…”
Section: Possible Impacts For a Ucn Source At The Essmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that at the ESS for a sD 2 UCN source a heat load of at least several kW at 5 K can be expected, taking into account that the heat load on the FRM II UCN source is ∼500 W. A cooling power of several kW at 5 K is technically feasible, but already requires cooling machines at the commercially available upper power limit. Concerning the fact, that for a He-II source temperatures below 1 K are desired, thus requiring even more high-power cooling techniques, a sD 2 source for the inpile case seems to be more realistic and easier achievable, although Serebrov et al have demonstrated at the WWR-M reactor at PNPI that, with an efficient thermal shielding and powerful cooling techniques, it is possible to remove 60 W of heat from a He-II converter at a temperature of 1.37 K [55]. An effective sD 2 converter thickness of a few cm would be sufficient, if the UCN source is placed at a position where a strong cold neutron flux from the lower liquid D 2 moderator hits the deuterium converter.…”
Section: Possible Impacts For a Ucn Source At The Essmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many new UCN sources around the world currently operational, being developed, or proposed [134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143] based on the principles of the superthermal process. Superfluid liquid helium (LHe) and solid deuterium (SD 2 ) have been successfully applied as UCN converters.…”
Section: Statisticalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production volume is made of 1500 L of superfluid helium at 0.45 K and the expected UCN production rate is 0.3 UCN/cm 3 /s. The third source will be built at the WWR-M reactor at PNPI, Gatchina, Russia [14]. UCN will be produced in a 1.2 K superfluid helium bath.…”
Section: Ultracold-neutron Production In Superfluid Heliummentioning
confidence: 99%